Moderna and the Czech FOIA Data and the Company's Deep State Background

by Scott Creighton

Via a Czech FOIA request, someone got a hold of record-level data of some 10 million citizens from the Czech Republic showing, for the first time, accurate real-world excess mortality rates for the various Covid-19 'vaccines' across the country and across all age groups.

Steve Kirsch has done an analysis of the data and his findings are quite interesting. As expected, the attacks on him have already begun. His reputational assailants seem to come from institutions with contracts with either Moderna or DARPA or both. Go figure.

Some Background

Moderna = modern...modified...RNA

In 2010 Flagship Ventures (vulture capitalist company) created Moderna with the idea to develop vaccines (and other drugs) exclusively using mRNA technology.

Between 2011 and 2017 Moderna collected 2 billion dollars from a variety of vulture capitalist In-Q-Tel-type slush-funds.

 

In 2013 Moderna 'was awarded a $25,000,000 grant by DARPA through a program Autonomous Diagnostics to Enable Prevention and Therapeutics: Prophylactic Options to Environmental and Contagious Threats (ADEPT-PROTECT). Its stated goal was to develop an mRNA vaccine with the capability to suppress a global pandemic within 60 days '

In 2016 Moderna  received 20 million dollar award from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to develop mRNA antibody drugs.

In 2020 DoD gives Moderna 2 billion dollar contract for mRNA 'vaccines'

In 2022 DoD gives Moderan ANOTHER 2 billion dollars for the same useless 'vaccines'

In early March of 2020, about 60 days since the announcement of Covid-19, Moderna entered the first stage of clinical trials of it's Covid-19 vaccine. 

Keep in mind it was a Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) lab that created Sars-CoV-2 (Covid-19) in the first place under a DoD contract with Anthony Fauci's NIAID work with EcoHealth Alliance.

'A grant proposal written by the U.S.-based nonprofit the EcoHealth Alliance and submitted in 2018 to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, provides evidence that the group was working — or at least planning to work — on several risky areas of research. Among the scientific tasks the group described in its proposal, which was rejected by DARPA, was the creation of full-length infectious clones of bat SARS-related coronaviruses and the insertion of a tiny part of the virus known as a “proteolytic cleavage site” into bat coronaviruses. Of particular interest was a type of cleavage site able to interact with furin, an enzyme expressed in human cells.' The Intercept 2021

Moderna was created by the Deep State for just such a crisis as the one they themselves manufactured and unleashed in late 2019 around the same time some of the players mentioned above were holding a table-top exercise at Johns Hopkins for dealing with a surprise global pandemic of a new novel coronavirus.

At 'Warp Speed' the DoD, behind all of this, was enabled by then president Donald Trump to roll out the experimental jabs as fast as possible and get them in as many arms as possible regardless of the risks to the public.

This was a DoD project from start to finish.

Which brings us to the Steve Kirsch findings.

Kirsch Findings Video

I will attempt to let Kirsch explain the importance of the data himself. It's Rumble so I have no idea if this embed effort will work.

https://rumble.com/embed/v54usqd/?pub=4

If that doesn't work go here.

He claims that the uptake for the various vaccines were pretty much random but another doctor/researcher seems to disagree a little with his take on that suggesting certain folks seem to have been directed toward or they gravitated toward one mRNA jab over the other so it's not a perfect data evaluation like say a double-blind randomized test would provide but it's still very enlightening in terms of just how many excess deaths were caused by one experimental mRNA jab verses another turned out.

His conclusion is that pretty much across the board, the DoD-backed and created Moderna mRNA experimental jab killed at about a 50% higher rate than the Pfizer did.

Oddly Brown University said Moderna was safer for older adults which seems to be a kind of play on the numbers since Moderna, according to Kirsch, was FAR more dangerous on younger people when compared to Pfizer than it was to older folks. Maybe that is what they mean.

During an interview a couple years back the head of Pfizer said 'they' told him to make an mRNA type vaccine for Covid-19 at the start of the pandemic when he suggested they make a standard inactive virus type vaccine. I asked who 'they' might refer to when it came to being able to dictate to a trillion dollar company what type of product they stake their reputation and their business on.

Seemed like a valid question at the time.

Turns out 'they' were probably the DoD and 'they' had a plan that went back a very long time.

Why would Moderna be more dangerous? Shoddy preparation and manufacturing? I don't think so.

I think 'they' brought in Pfizer in order to either run their 'vaccines' as a control in the grand experiment or they were tasked with doing another branch of mRNA research in order to speed up the process of discovery.

Hard too say without being there.

Either way, Kirsch's study is indeed very interesting and worth taking the time to read and watch his video presentation of his findings.

But you have to understand where a thing comes from in order to see clearly where it's going. And when Kirsch asks why the MSM ignored the data dump in the first place, knowing Moderna's genesis might just provide the answers he seeks.