(That's a mighty specific number for it to be caused by 'air quality, tobacco and fat people, don't you think? It's almost as if they know exactly how many experimental jabs were given out and what percentage of those jabs cause cancer. Almost as if.)
from RT
Global cases of cancer will surge to 35 million by the year 2050, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) cancer agency has predicted – a 77% increase over figures reported in 2022.
The predictive data, published on Thursday by the WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), cites the use of tobacco and alcohol, as well as obesity and poor air quality, as the primary factors driving the expected increase in cases by 2050.
“Over 35 million new cancer cases are predicted in 2050,” the IARC said in a statement on its website, adding that this number is 77% higher than the 20 million diagnosed in 2022.
The IARC’s biannual report, which is based on data from 185 countries and 36 different types of cancer, also said that there were some 9.7 million deaths from the illness globally in 2022. About one in five people can expect to develop cancer in their lifetimes, it added, with one in nine men dying from the disease compared to about one in 12 women...
read more here
I moved to Tallahassee about 10 years ago. I’ve been in construction for almost 3 decades. I pay attention to the trends, (economic, demographic, and financial,) due to the cyclical nature of the business.
ReplyDeleteThat said, about 6 years ago I was paying attention to the commercial paper market nationally, as it was ballooning way past fiscal stability. When looking at the local market, it made sense that the commercial boon was concentrating in two areas; large apartment complexes (college town with a due need based on growth projections,) and - what caught me off guard - was a MASSIVE push for private medical buildings specializing in cancer treatments and diagnostics. Tallahassee is not a large market, and I didn’t understand why scores of new complexes - not affiliated with established local facilities - would invest so much in such a niche market. Personally, growing up in Florida, I’ve seen that the cancer industry is a horrific scam, and have no faith that it has anything to do with health.
Then covid hit.
Now, in retrospect, it makes sense. People don’t invest in “maybe” which tells me, money knew what was coming down the pipe.
Game-changer for regulation of genome editing and new tech
ReplyDeleteSouth Africa's Ag Minister overrules Industry and Appeal Board
The African Centre for Biodiversity (ACB) welcomes the final decision taken by the South African Minister of Agriculture Ms came in e-mail.
Interesting now we have S.A. pushing back hard on two very major policies running out of control.
Here NBT "techniques" in GM engineering.
Game-changer for regulation of genome editing and new tech
South Africa's Ag Minister overrules Industry and Appeal Board
The African Centre for Biodiversity (ACB) welcomes the final decision taken by the South African Minister of Agriculture Ms
hoko Didiza, in terms of section 19 of the Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) Act of 1997, to uphold the October 2021 decision of the Executive Council (EC) that the risk assessment framework existing for GMOs will also apply to new breeding techniques (NBTs)1. These NBTs make up a host of new genetic engineering technologies.
In a double blow, the Minister’s decision rejects the challenge by a powerful consortium of agricultural industry actors, under the aegis of the Agricultural Business Chamber of South Africa (AGBIZ), which comprises the South African National Seed Organisation (SANSOR) and CropLife, against the decision of the EC in terms of section 19 of the GMO Act, in November 2021. It further also rejects the findings of an Appeal Board, whose membership is secret – constituted by the Minister in terms of the GMO Act – which found in favour of the flimsy and tenuous arguments of the industry.
The South African decision is a significant game changer on the continent, which is facing a strong push to adopt novel GM technologies, such as cisgenesis and intragenesis; RNAi-mediated DNA methylation; agroinfiltration; reverse breeding; and genome editing techniques (CRISPR and gene drives; TALENS; and oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis). In contrast, Kenya, Ghana, Malawi, and Nigeria have already adopted approaches not to regulate these technologies in terms of biosafety legislation. The positions taken by these countries will face stronger pushback from civil society on the continent, perhaps even leading to reversals.
According to Mariam Mayet, director of the ACB:
consumers and farmers, and their exclusion from regulation would accelerate the privatisation of seed and its ownership, to the cost of consumers and farmers.”
The ACB, and indeed civil society in South Africa, have been strenuously resisting the advance of these technologies for several years. For us, these NBTs are more of the same as transgenic technologies; providing a new set of false solutions that will undoubtedly continue to exacerbate biodiversity loss while failing to produce healthier, more nutritious, or more diverse food for Africans, and failing to allow for better incomes or fairer prices for farmers.
According to the ACB, these NBTs are intended to function as colonial mechanisms to entrap agricultural and food systems, and secure and capture new markets for industrially produced corporate-owned seed, and should therefore be banned.
The beneficiaries of these technologies are certainly not the people of South Africa but the corporations who own the technologies, whereas farmers will continue to be left vulnerable to changes in the climate and other shocks. Already, the handful of biotechnology companies that dominate the global commercial seed and pesticide markets also dominate ownership of the patents on genome editing technologies.
Let's give some credit for the above unfolding tidal wave of disease, sickness and DETH to that other world controller acronym, the FDA!
ReplyDeleteRemember their ongoing official policy tweets---here's just one:
https://makismd.substack.com/p/propaganda-series-covid-19-mrna-vaccinated
Jan.2, 2024 - 49 year old Champion bodybuilder and former paramedic Chad Russell McCrary died unexpectedly. In Aug.2021 he mocked Ivermectin as a “horse wormer” and got COVID-19 Vaccinated.
Spot the 3 differences between these two (this is one of those mental/visual acuity/competence tests you can find many clips on utube):
Medieval doctor plague costume:
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/79/92/b8/7992b8167667399ac669fba124e691e9.jpg
Family guy DEATH:
http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20071219220753/familyguy/images/f/ff/Death.JPG
Article is from DEC/2023 note.
ReplyDelete3 female, 1 male. all under 45.
So why only being noted NOW when i assume there are many, many of these 'fat influencers' online for years by now many of them, with many subs; any dying regularly but rarely wouldn't really be noted as significant or ordinary or appear in an alarming article.
The 3 women are/were in that 4+/5+ rating, but even then it's very rare for women with any health complications affecting the heart/CV system like even smoking to die in their 40's--moreso it's males in 40's.
Interesting if this trend continues apace for at least this year.
I was actually researching hollyweird early (under 40-45) celebrity deaths and found in the search!
Fat Activists Keep Dying!
Isaac Butterfield
FEB5
https://youtu.be/3MVpOBf50jQ?t=204