(archived from August 2, 2009)
by Scott Creighton
***UPDATE*** anyone want to join in on the conversation? We are having an interesting chat on the comments section… jump right in folks…
Just look at him. He’s a weasel.
Disinfo specialist, red-chip peddling, snake oil salesman. What he and Jones have done to the “Truth” movement is criminal. Their ridiculous claim about the “thermetic” material (that’s not even a WORD people) kicked the Truth movement right off the tracks.
Their own paper says that they can’t even be sure how it MAY have been used… they can’t even tell if it COULD have been used to blow up ANYTHING! Yet everyone runs around talking about this “highly thermetic material” as if it is the end all be all to the unofficial investigation.
Niels himself has gone on record saying based on the amounts of these chips they found in the dust, he estimates 10 tons of the shit was in the dust after the demolition. 10 tons? Unexploded “thermetic” material? What does that mean they actually USED to bring the towers down? 100 tons? A thousand? It’s completely ridiculous, like Jim Hoffman’s “Plausible” hypothesis for how the “thermetic material” was used in the demolition. Remember that? 100s of “illegal aliens” running around at break-neck speeds planting 1.8 MILLION individual CEILING TILE BOMBS and kicker charges disguised as FIRE EXTINGUISHERS?!?
Hey Steven and Neils, I got an idea: why not test for the exact kind of explosive residue that the controlled demolition industry ACTUALLY USES? Hey, there’s a concept. You know, the kind of tests that NIST and FEMA report that they DIDN’T run? The kind of test that you yourselves also admit you DIDN’T run? The kind of test I specifically ASKED you to run, not once but TWICE now in private communications? And the VERY kinds of tests you yourselves suggest SOMEONE ELSE RUNS in your recent bullshit “thermetic material” paper?
You know, THOSE tests. That’s an idea, huh? The kind of tests that Greg Roberts told me in an email that he DIDN’T want to run because a negative result might hurt the Truth movement. Those tests.
Niels Harrit, weasel? Yeah, here is the greasy video. Here’s a quote from the genius… “If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck…”
What a genius. Word to other Truth sites out there: stick to David Ray Griffin and quit talking about this ridiculous “thermetic material” bullshit.
here’s a video of some more of Neils doing what he does best; undermining the Truth movement from within. Enjoy.
Well, let me point out one more OBVIOUS fallacy in Mr. Harrit’s argument…
He states that these red-grey chips are CLOSE in composition to the type of paint used on the IRON BEAMS in the Trade Centers but slightly different… WHAT HE DOESN’T tell you is that the paint used on the TRUSSES would be slightly DIFFERENT than the paint used on the columns, or BEAMS.
In fact, he then goes on to argue that the NIST report tested the BEAMS with a paint deformation test to determine the temperatures that the beams were exposed to thereby setting an ignition temp for the paint on the beams… he DOESN’T mention the fact that the paint could have come from a separate source, the TRUSSES.
The trusses are what all the “molten metal” came from. Look at ANY picture of the aftermath of the collapse of the towers. You will see dust (the concrete floor systems pulverized) and you will see exterior columns and interior columns all piled up and scattered about.
What you DON’T see is the TRUSSES. The THOUSANDS of STEEL trusses are missing. Why? Because when the HIGH EXPLOSIVES that were placed under the floors and inside the TRUSS systems, was ignited, the 4,000 degree plus temperatures MELTED the TRUSSES and PULVERIZED the concrete floors of the towers.
That is why some of the red/grey chips are attached to the iron-rich micro-spheres; because they were BOTH created at the SAME TIME. The red/grey chips ARE paint, with a slightly different chemical make-up that what was used on the columns, and from the OTHER location that had red painted steel in the Twin Towers… the TRUSSES.
No comments:
Post a Comment