by Scott Creighton (archived repost from Sept 6, 2010)
A video posted at
Kenny’s Sideshow (quietly emerging as one of the best Truth sites out
there) examines the formerly unheralded events that took place at Fresh
Kills landfill right after 9/11. It is intended to show the complex
process that was set up to “recover” human remains and personal items
from the debris from Ground Zero (Twin Towers, and Building 7)
but I think it proves a great deal more.
Two glaring aspects of
the video stand out; the first being the level of pulverization of
everything in the Twin Towers, from filing cabinets, to desks, to the
concrete in the floors, the carpet on the floors, and the ceiling tiles,
drywall, chairs, computers… everything. Everything was pulverized to
dust and unfortunately, that also includes the victims who died that
day.
The next most
important thing that leaps out at you as you watch this video is the
evidence of the massive level of heat that had to be present during the
relatively short collapse time of the Twin Towers. Metal signs from the
34th floor are charred and burned (there was no fire on the 34th
floor)… police officers guns have all the plastic and rubber handles
melted off while their chrome finishes are burned away allowing for rust
and pitting to set in and the same is true with their handcuffs. Some
guns were burned so badly, they are actually melted.
This is what is to be
expected during an event using huge amounts of high explosives such as
PETN or RDX, two materials commonly used in controlled demolitions. But
don’t expect NIST to point that fact out… or current “leaders” of the
Truth movement either, for that matter. Funny how that works, ain’t it?
PETN
actually burns hotter than most high explosives, at around 7650 deg. farenheit (4230 C) and it creates a
detonation velocity of over 8350 meters per second. PETN is the core material used in what is refered to in the demolition industry as “det cord“,
a high explosive in itself used to break up concrete structures during
demolitions and also connect RDX linear shaped charges or “cutter
charges” placed on the steel beams and columns in a controlled explosive
demolition.
Kevin Ryan recently wrote an article in
which he mentions what I have stated for several years, that there was
an ongoing “wiring upgrade” for the security system in the Twin Towers
that was going on right up until 9/11 (Ryan unfortunately then tries to
suggest that the this has something to do with “super thermite”, a
material that both Steven Jones and “Gregg” Roberts have admitted isn’t a
high explosive and therefore couldn’t “blow up” a doll-house…). An
article from 2005 describes part of the contract…
“According to Jeff Gallup, a former Stratesec manager who left the company for a position at Landtek, Inc., Stratesec installed the initial security-description plan—the layout of the electronic security system—at the World Trade Center. Gallup knows the WTC site well, since Landtek, like EJ Electric, was a prime contractor at the trade center. He was “intimately involved” with WTC security, he said in a phone interview last year, up to September 12, 2001, when “the F.B.I. left my office with all the contents of the WTC visitors database,” by then three-quarters of a million visitors’ badges.” M. Burns, 2005
The security “upgrade” involved running new fiber-optic cables through-out both of the Twin Towers, on each and every floor ( above the dropped ceilings and beneath the metal floor pans of the floor above)
as well as down the electrical access shafts located in the “core” of
the buildings where the 47 massive steel columns were. This cover
provided ample access to every single floor of the building regardless
of the tenet’s security concerns, plus it allowed them to actually
install the means of demolition right in front of the occupants without
them ever suspecting the dangerous nature of what was being installed.
Now of course, you can
read the label there, but if it was covered or wasn’t ever printed on
the spool, you couldn’t tell the difference. It is my theory that what
they did was basically run det cord up inside the
cable chases that were installed up inside the lightweight concrete (image
taken from NCSTAR report, page 6) of each and every floor of the Twin
Towers. By the way, the images are from manufacturer sites:
Green is det cord… orange is
fiber-optics.
This is my own rendering of what I believe the “security upgrade” consisted of….
what I believe happened to the Twin Towers.
(you will notice that
my temperature calculation for the detonation of PETN is a bit low… I
figured it to be ” > 7050 deg. f” and it turns out according to Wiki
to be 7650 deg. f. )
So why is all this important in relation to the video shown at the end of this article? Well, for several reasons…
1. The evidence of
extreme heat disproves the Official Theory of what happened to the Twin
Towers. In the official story, the primary event is a gravitational
collapse of a weakened structure. Pulverization would not have occurred
on such a complete level, but it is difficult to explain or prove that
to followers of that theory. However, the evidence of extreme levels of
heat, levels that are clearly hotter than jet fuel and “open burn” fires
can produce, prove that something else was in play on Sept. 11th
2001. The RJ Lee report was the first to make this point perfectly
clear.
2. The evidence of massive pulverization disproves the generally accepted “super thermite” story that was
created and funded by the ultra-conservative BYU. In their “nanothermite” paper (paid for and “peer-reviewed”
by BYU)
Jones
et al make the point very clear that they can’t tell if the material they found was capable of achieving a detonation velocity of
anywhere near 3000 meters per second, which is needed to create a
detonation wave.. therefore it couldn’t pulverize anything, much less
concrete and office furniture ect. This is actually admitted in the
“scientific” paper, peer reviewed by BYU and published at a vanity press
for “political reasons”
“I can not accept that the issue is put in my journal. The article is not about physical chemistry or chemical physics, and I could well believe that there is a political point of view behind the publication.” Chief Editor of the Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal, Professor Marie-Paule Pileni, upon her resignation (translated)
Even “Gregg” Roberts (famous for his involvement in Jim Hoffman’s “believe the Pentagon OCT” website) had to admit in a Q&A session that “nano-thermite” couldn’t “blow up” anything…
Question: I was having a conversation with someone in the military who uses thermite when they enter doors and things. And that thermite doesn’t create and explosion. it just creates a bright light and instant melting, so is that because of air pressure that caused the explosions after the thermite went off or is there another reason?Gregg Roberts: I wouldn’t say that thermite caused blasts, I would say that would have to have been (unintelligable)… other than explosives which the government has refused to test for (the same way Roberts refused to test for them?)… it would seem to make sence to do those tests when you can see things are shattered…” Panel Discussion on 911
3. The evidence of a
logical and plausible method of planting the high explosives in the
buildings (something that for all their efforts (“1.8 million ceiling tile bombs”
and “explosive paint”) the “nano-thermite” cult simply cannot do) and
then clear evidence of an elaborate process to “scrub up” the remaining
evidence from the Ground Zero debris.
In short, this video helps to prove that there is no rational theory of what happened to the Twin Towers except one.
It’s not the official
collapse theory nor is it the “nano-thermite” theory supported by the
controlled opposition of the Truth Movement.
The only rational theory of what happened to the Twin Towers is what we always expected to find from the very beginning;
this was a jobbed-out controlled demolition using standard high explosives pre-set through-out the buildings.
This is an outstanding
video which goes to show the unprecedented level of effort they put
into covering up the evidence of the events of 9/11.
An entire production
facility was created and operated for 10 months to ensure that no hard
evidence of a controlled demolition was buried at Fresh Kills to be
unearthed at a later date when a future investigation may be
undertaken. The scope of the efforts taken and the planning that had to
go into all of this is unbelievable. Fresh Kills itself was shut down
in March of 2001 so that they wouldn’t be bothered by the dumping of
other material during this process. Every single personal item that was
returned was “washed” and the autos and fire trucks were not only
“washed” but they were also shredded “on site” (they actually brought in
a massive shedder for this process rather than risk taking the vehicles
off site). Photographs were strictly prohibited under threat of
imprisonment and most of the people working the site were either FBI or
some other members of various “security agencies”. Three things they
supposedly sifted for were 1. human remains 2. personal property and 3.
unidentified material (which was put in its own containers)
They sifted for months
and months, then when they were done with the 1.8 million tons of
debris from Ground Zero, they scrapped up the top 2 feet of debris and
sifted it again just to be sure. Then they literally buried it all under
a foot of fresh soil, threw some sod over top of the whole thing, and
quietly packed up and went off to their next project.
But the pictures and the videos remain and those who know what to look for can make use of them.
Scattered across lower
Manhattan were another couple hundred tons of hard evidence in the form
of Ground Zero dust. That material they couldn’t recapture, they
couldn’t control and in it lies solid hard evidence of the crime of
9/11. They couldn’t control that material, so they did the next best
thing…
they controlled the unofficial investigation as best they could.
Perhaps this video will also help expose the flaws in the cognitive
infiltration of BYU’s “nano-thermite” mythology. Who knows.
No comments:
Post a Comment