by Scott Creighton
Jason Goodman of Crowdsource the Truth has weighed in on the Charlie Kirk shooting unofficial investigation and it shouldn't be considered shocking that he is siding with Range DayBro in trying to convince people that Charlie was shot from behind which makes the wound to Charlie's neck and exit rather than an entrance wound.
Crowdsource the Truth (CtT) is a gimmick. It was a scheme used by the likes of both George Webb and Robert David Steele, both of which worked with Jason at one time or another and both ended up suing and being sued by Goodman.
It was this gaggle of geniuses who shut down a port in Charleston SC. with fake claims of a 'dirty bomb' being brought it by the dreaded Islamists back in 2017.
'Crowdsourcing the Truth' means they open up a direct input line from the viewers online who can then present them with whatever bullshit 'evidence' they have of whatever psyop is running at the time.
The problem is, CtT doesn't fact check the bullshit, they just run with it, let come what may. They call this 'open source' investigating.
That makes it a perfect vehicle for disinformation to be installed into unofficial investigations, to confuse, distract and derail... like what Jason is doing right now.
The big push to derail unofficial investigations right now when it comes to Charlie Kirk is to claim the shot came from behind Charlie, not in front where we have video evidence of a shooter (not Tyler Robinson and not the guy we see waling up the stairs dressed like Tyler in his Facebook picture) is as clear as a video taken moments before the shot.
The problem with their ridiculous claim is that there is definitive proof the shot did NOT hit Charlie on the right side of either his neck or his head which comes in the form of a clear video shot from right behind Kirk on that side.
What was claimed by Range DayBro as blood spatter from the right side of his head is CLEARLY the wire from his earpiece he was wearing at the time, which you can see flying off his head.
You can also see how his body pulls back and to the left while a large protrusion seems to come from his back/neck area pushing his shirt out as the bullet fragments leave his body.
As I showed you in a previous video, it was this pulling of Charlie's shirt in the back which pulled the front of his shirt up.
A witness told Candice Owens that he thought the round used was a Hornady V-Max .223 Varmint due to the sound it makes and the look of the wound. He also said he saw a much shorter rifle in the hands of the person on the roof and that he was dressed in tactical gear wearing a mask.
None of that is on the person running across the roof and dropping down.
As I told you long ago, the rifle they claim Tyler Robinson used, Mauser x95 from WWI, was never on the roof which is why you don't see that guy carrying it.
From that I suggested it might have been an IWI assault rifle, standard issue for IDF troops, with is certainly in range for the shot. The IWI fires a 5.56 round which is almost the exact same as the .223 and Frontier makes a Hornady V-Max varmint round for it.
But that is just a possibility.
Jason's grift is based on yet another new video taken from Charlie's left side, once again ignoring the definitive view from right and behind which completely debunks this line of disinformation.
Anything Jason Goodman, Robert David Steele or George Webb offers up to any investigation should be taken with a serious metric ton of grains of salt considering their sources are almost certainly intelligence agency assets looking to derail citizen investigations like Cass Sunstein once wrote about.
Considering Jason will probably file a lawsuit against me because I dare to challenge his conclusions and obviously flawed methodology (Jason sues just about everybody at the drop of a hat)
Below is my video on how I believe the shooting took place based on many sources, none of which were sent to me by anonymous intelligence agency assets. Below that, a video of a ballistic gel test of a Hornady V-Max .223 round showing exactly the kind of rapid expansion I and the man talking to Candice were trying to explain.
I will make a video on this subject this morning.
My video
ballistic gel video
Be wary of Goodman and George Webb.
No comments:
Post a Comment