9/11: The Conventional Explosives Hypothesis (a summary of Scott Creighton’s work)

(I don't know who wrote back in 2018, I'm sorry. I had no idea it was written. A very nice and thorough  analysis of my work on 9/11 demolition theory. Outstanding even. All the links are broken, however, I would guess you can find each article by using the link and the Way Back Machine. Thank you very much, whomever you are. Looks like the author stopped posting around July 2023. Hope you see this. Thanks again. Good work.)

from KapitalGate

Mr. Creighton’s hypothesis, authored over many articles, argues that the Towers were destroyed “via conventional demolition, and that during the design stages of the process, the conspirators relied too heavily on the use of detonation cord in the floor systems, which led to the vaporization of most of the truss systems. This was accidentally revealed (the “iron microspheres”) when the RJ Lee Group did their Composition and Morphology study of the Ground Zero dust samples for Deutsche Bank.”

PETN/RDX is a good candidate because these are the most commonly used hi-explosives in the industry. They have a long, studied history and are generally reliable. It’s sensible to start with the most plausible hypothesis (conventional hi-explosives) first, and failing that, move onto testing more exotic hypotheses.

Primaline 85 detonator cord would be used to pulverize the concrete, and also to remove the building’s lateral support supplied by the double-bridged long trusses. RDX cutter and kicker charges would be used to cut columns down to a specific length (every three floors is a common estimate from what I’ve read), and then ‘kick’ those columns out of the way from the proceeding downward collapse. Refer to article three, “Demolition Hypothesis”, for further details on the demolition sequence.

Background Reading if interested (Chronological Order):..

read more here