Bad Polling Here and I24 Bad Propaganda in France

Bad Polling Here and I24 Bad Propaganda in France 

my article https://nomadiceveryman.blogspot.com/2026/10/i24-news-israel-of-40-beheaded-babies.html 

Direct Support 

I24 News Israel of '40 Beheaded Babies' fame is up to it again

by Scott Creighton

(Quick note: this morning's video is not playing. Seems like there may be an issue with the server at Bitchute as someone left a comment there saying other videos were also not playing. I tried to reupload it to no avail.)

I24 News Israel of '40 Beheaded Babies' fame is up to it again and it stinks to high heaven.

They did some kind of 'man on the street' interview in Paris with someone they claimed was an Iraqi born person named 'Ali' who went on to cast serious shade on protests taking place in France right now. The guy says 'Israel was right' as I24 shows some dude sitting on a mailbox next to a burning tire holding a Palestinian flag. 

 

'Well, it turns out that "Ali" is actually Hezi Gangina, an Israeli tourist who lives in the South Tel Aviv neighborhood of Kfar Shalem, built on the ruins of the Palestinian village of Salama.' @ireallyhateyou 

Yep. More theatrics from I24. The interview was staged and it was edited to try to make people who support Palestine look like 'radicals'  (I'm guessing the violence and vandalism in France right now is probably black bloc agent provocateurs but I can't speak to that right now) 

The reporter asks him what is the connection between Free Palestine and France and of course the Jewish Israeli Zionist says 'zero' as that was the point of the propaganda... get French citizens to blame Muslims and Palestinians for the chaos in their streets.

Leave it to the Zionist propagandists to see an opportunity to latch onto for their own gains.

Oh No: Rethuglicans Talking About the Polls Being 'Wrong'

Even polls paid for by Republican campaigns are showing a landslide for the Dems in Nov. so when the leading Rethuglicans start talking about all the polls being 'wrong' at the same time, with our faith-based election system in place, you better take heed. Of course everyone who is anyone on the alt-left says it's a conspiracy theory so they'll be useless once this trick of theirs shakes out.

Direct Support 

The Bi-Partisan Attack on Trump for Siding with Russia (BRICS)

Oh my goodness the long knives are out for Trump because he abandoned the Lindsey Warmonger Graham sanctions bill against Russia and seems to want to put an end to the regime change destabilization campaign otherwise known as the Russia/Ukraine war. Watch the alt-left independent journalists stand with the likes of neocon and PNAC member Max Boot as everyone suddenly jumps on the Azov (Nazi) train to attack Trump for daring to want to put an end to the globalist operation. This is multipolar world order verses (Western) unipolar world order and everyone expects the media and the politicians and the influencer class to know which side they better come down on if they want to appease our glorious oligarchs of the West. Guess I'm just not smart enough to know which side my bread is buttered on like they do.

NYT https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/18/us/politics/trump-russia-sanctions-hostage-negotiations.html

Kyle https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5fMvTUOK7A

Acosta https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBQ3Fat6XKA 

Direct Support 

Destabilizing Russia – Clinton State Department Dusts off Color Revolution Model and Threatens Us All (archive)

(archived from December 8, 2011)

by Scott Creighton

The accusations of election fraud in Russia are simply a retaliatory destabilization campaign being waged by Hillary Clinton and her minions of pro-democracy NGOs against the ruling party of Vladamir Putin. The people of Russia don’t buy it, the NGO employees who are being forced to go out into the streets and “protest” are starting to refuse to show up (would you commit treason against a leader like Putin for a pathetic little paycheck?), Putin himself has exposed Hillary’s little pathetic game to the world, and the “pro-democracy” opposition players are ex-Yeltsin era globalist cronies who sold off the state assets of the people of Russia to multinational financial institutions in exchange for millions and millions of dollars.

In short, it’s not going to work but that won’t stop the globalist media PR networks from helping Hillary spread a little destabilization to one of the few remaining super-powers, a country that has enough nuclear firepower to wipe the U.S. off the map several times over and a conventional military that if teamed with Iran, Pakistan, and Syria, could crush our forces in the region in a matter of weeks. That’s to say nothing of throwing China into the mix.

But none of that will stop Hillary Clinton. She’s bound and determined to flex her NGO and psyop media muscle to show Russia she can do to them what she did to Libya. Remember her little giggly gloating interview she gave after her rebels tortured and murdered Moammar Gadhafi (“we came, we saw, he died“)? The question might need to be asked in light of her recent behavior, borderline psychotic behavior, is it time to force Washington to deClintonize itself before their Hitlereque behavior lights a fuse we can’t put out.

Anwar al Awlaki: Public Enemy #1 or Something Else? (archive)

(archived from September 30, 2011)

by Scott Creighton

“No person … shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law” Fifth Amendment, US Constitution

It is being reported that the United States launched a drone strike in Yemen that killed targeted US citizen Anwar Awlaki as well as former North Carolina resident Samir Khan. Now, if he’s actually dead.. this time… what exactly does it mean? Who did Obama kill without due process of law and more importantly… why?

While President Obama (Peace Prize “winner” (Nobel committee admitted they gave him the award because they wanted to “support his agenda” and not for anything that he had done “”It was because we would like to support what he is trying to achieve“”)) is busy patting himself on the back for what he calls a “major blow” against al Qaeda, keep in mind that the entire al Awlaki story is fraught with bullshit and exaggeration from the very beginning. Now he supposedly gets killed while riding along with a completely fraudulent al CIAda psyop by the name of Samir Khan?

Anybody else thinking about those dead bin Laden photos that were going around the congress until someone pointed out that they were an internet hoax dating back to 2005 or so? The congressmen who were shown the photos refused to tell us who provided them but we have to figure that they came from high placed officials in the White House. I can’t remember.. was bin Laden using his wife as a human shield and is it really customary to rush the body of a Muslim halfway across a country so you can dump it in the ocean before anyone can see it?

Let’s start with the basics on Anwar al Awlaki. President Obama says this is a major blow to al Qaeda. Hmmm….

“But in truth Mr. Awlaki is hardly significant in terms of American security. Contrary to what the Obama administration would have you believe, he has always been a minor figure in Al Qaeda, and making a big deal of him now is backfiring….

… But no one should remain under the mistaken assumption that killing Mr. Awlaki will somehow make us safer.

He is far from the terrorist kingpin that the West has made him out to be. In fact, he isn’t even the head of his own organization, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. That would be Nasir al-Wuhayshi, who was Osama bin Laden’s personal secretary for four years in Afghanistan.

Nor is Mr. Awlaki the deputy commander, a position held by Said Ali al-Shihri, a former detainee at Guantánamo Bay who was repatriated to Saudi Arabia in 2007 and put in a “terrorist rehabilitation” program. (The treatment, clearly, did not take.)

Mr. Awlaki isn’t the group’s top religious scholar (Adil al-Abab), its chief of military operations (Qassim al-Raymi), its bomb maker (Ibrahim Hassan Asiri) or even its leading ideologue (Ibrahim Suleiman al-Rubaysh).

Rather, he is a midlevel religious functionary who happens to have American citizenship and speak English. This makes him a propaganda threat, but not one whose elimination would do anything to limit the reach of the Qaeda branch.” New York Times, Nov. 19th 2010

Anwar al Awlaki was never indicted on any counts. He was never officially charged with any crime. He was not the head of any al Qaeda group nor had he made any weapons or claimed to have planned any attacks and yet he was supposedly killed on just the say-so of the “progressive’ president of this country… the president of “CHANGE”

Obama Administration: Arm al Qaeda? YES WE CAN! (archive)

(archived from March 26, 2011)

by Scott Creighton

Life in Bizzarro Post 9/11 World rolls on.

Today, the administration of our Peace Prize “winning” president is trying it’s level best to find a legal loop-hole in their precious UN resolution 1970 and 1973 which will allow them to arm former (and current) members al Qaeda in Libya.

After using their combined influence, which was substantial, Britain, France, and the United States were able to pressure the U.N. security council into passing resolutions which allowed them to impose a no-fly zone over Libya (for “humanitarian” reasons, of course) and to freeze the assets of the Libyan nationalized oil company and state owned central bank. While resolution 1973 does provide for a range of potential “humanitarian” actions, it specifically rejects three activities…

“… while excluding a (1) foreign occupation force of any form on any part of Libyan territory…”

“… Deplores the continuing flows of (2) mercenaries into the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya and calls upon all Member States to comply strictly with their obligations under paragraph 9 of resolution 1970 (2011) to prevent the provision of armed mercenary personnel to the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya…”

“… to ensure strict implementation of the (3) arms embargo established by paragraphs 9 and 10 of resolution 1970 (2011)…” UN Resolution 1973

So according to the UN resolution, the big three imperial states aren’t allowed to put their own troops on the ground in Libya (something Britain and the U.S. are reported to have already done) nor are they allowed to send (more) mercenaries into the conflict zone.  With those stipulations set into concrete international law, the only thing left for them to do to support their latest “color revolution” is to use US tax-payer dollars to pay for weapons to be handed over to the opposition forces.  Unfortunately for the imperialist coalition, arming any faction in this conflict is also prohibited by the very resolution they pushed for.

And one would think that arming former and possibly current members of al Qaeda might be frowned upon in this post 9/11 world.  According to the current administration, we can’t afford to find money for teachers and our school systems, but when it comes to giving weapons to al Qaeda for the destabilization of another country?  YES THEY CAN!

Egyptian Color Revolution Continues: Efforts to Block New Anti-neoliberal Constitution Failing (archive)

(archived from December 5, 2012)

by Scott Creighton

Contrary to popular propaganda, only 16 out of the 100 members of the assembly who wrote the new Egyptian constitution were from the Muslim Brotherhood. 16 out of 100 folks.

Egypt’s new constitution despite what you have been told, was NOT written by all Islamists and fanatical Muslim Brotherhood members hell-bent to enshrine Sharia law in Egypt. That’s just a downright lie.

It was written, in accordance with the 2011 Provisional Constitution of Egypt which itself was written by the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces of Egypt , not “Islamists”, on 30 March, 2011 in order to forge a new Egypt governed by the rule of law in the wake of the removal of our puppet dictator, Mubarak.

When you are told this document “enshrines Sharia law” and was written by the Muslim Brotherhood, that is a direct lie. Pure and simple.

They formed, according to the law, a 100 member assembly in order to write the new constitution. It is called the Constituent Assembly of Egypt and the main criticism coming from both the MSM as well as various “alternative” news sites is that it is dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood and thus they wrote the constitution. Again, not true.

“An agreement to form a more balanced assembly was reached on 7 June 2012. 39 seats would be filled by members of parliament, six by judges, nine by law experts, one each by a member of the armed forces, the police and the justice ministry, 13 seats by unions, and 21 by public figures. Five seats would be filled by the Al-Azhar University, one of Sunni Islam’s most important institutions, and four by the Coptic Orthodox Church”  BBC

The Muslim Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice Party ended up having only 16 seats in the assembly while opposition parties had 22 seats. There were 61 independents.

The Fake Color Revolution is Back in Iran – Globalist Destabilization Efforts Under Cover of Egypt’s Real Revolution (archive)

(archived from February 15, 2011)

by Scott Creighton

In every crisis, real or manufactured, there is… opportunity.

Contrary to Julian Assange’s assessment, the current wave of pro-democracy movements in the Middle East (recently called a “virus” by John McCain) was not created by the CIA honeypot called Wikileaks. Nor, as the one-time Lyndon LaRouche follower Webster Tarpley has put it, was it all a CIA destabilization plan. There are causes that track back to the United States, English banks, and Wall Street which mainly deal with accelerating food prices due to rampant speculation, a global wave of unemployment due to a planned demolition of the global economy, and the despotic dictatorial rule by U.S. and British friendly puppet regimes, so yes, you can trace the roots of these outbreaks back to the global interests the CIA serves.

But these uprisings are mainly in countries that already serve our “national interests” ie our banks and multi-national corporations and many of them are critically important to ongoing venture capital programs like Egypt (Suez Canal) and Yemen (Hunt Oil Pipeline) for starters.

So why lite those fires when the outcome is uncertain at best?

C.I.A. destabilization plans are used in countries that are not already friendly to our interests (see above) such as Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, and of course… Iran.  The differences between the real revolutions and the fake ones are very important. We cannot forget.

… the struggle against power “is the struggle of memory against forgetting.” Milan Kundera

The Rain Maker: Elon and his Latest Confidence Scam - Flying Cars

I think it's fair too say I dislike Elon Musk more than the average bear. Let's see if I can prove it in this video shall we?

golden seed chick https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2qi69OYKRw 

Direct Support