Destabilizing Russia – Clinton State Department Dusts off Color Revolution Model and Threatens Us All (archive)

(archived from December 8, 2011)

by Scott Creighton

The accusations of election fraud in Russia are simply a retaliatory destabilization campaign being waged by Hillary Clinton and her minions of pro-democracy NGOs against the ruling party of Vladamir Putin. The people of Russia don’t buy it, the NGO employees who are being forced to go out into the streets and “protest” are starting to refuse to show up (would you commit treason against a leader like Putin for a pathetic little paycheck?), Putin himself has exposed Hillary’s little pathetic game to the world, and the “pro-democracy” opposition players are ex-Yeltsin era globalist cronies who sold off the state assets of the people of Russia to multinational financial institutions in exchange for millions and millions of dollars.

In short, it’s not going to work but that won’t stop the globalist media PR networks from helping Hillary spread a little destabilization to one of the few remaining super-powers, a country that has enough nuclear firepower to wipe the U.S. off the map several times over and a conventional military that if teamed with Iran, Pakistan, and Syria, could crush our forces in the region in a matter of weeks. That’s to say nothing of throwing China into the mix.

But none of that will stop Hillary Clinton. She’s bound and determined to flex her NGO and psyop media muscle to show Russia she can do to them what she did to Libya. Remember her little giggly gloating interview she gave after her rebels tortured and murdered Moammar Gadhafi (“we came, we saw, he died“)? The question might need to be asked in light of her recent behavior, borderline psychotic behavior, is it time to force Washington to deClintonize itself before their Hitlereque behavior lights a fuse we can’t put out.

Anwar al Awlaki: Public Enemy #1 or Something Else? (archive)

(archived from September 30, 2011)

by Scott Creighton

“No person … shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law” Fifth Amendment, US Constitution

It is being reported that the United States launched a drone strike in Yemen that killed targeted US citizen Anwar Awlaki as well as former North Carolina resident Samir Khan. Now, if he’s actually dead.. this time… what exactly does it mean? Who did Obama kill without due process of law and more importantly… why?

While President Obama (Peace Prize “winner” (Nobel committee admitted they gave him the award because they wanted to “support his agenda” and not for anything that he had done “”It was because we would like to support what he is trying to achieve“”)) is busy patting himself on the back for what he calls a “major blow” against al Qaeda, keep in mind that the entire al Awlaki story is fraught with bullshit and exaggeration from the very beginning. Now he supposedly gets killed while riding along with a completely fraudulent al CIAda psyop by the name of Samir Khan?

Anybody else thinking about those dead bin Laden photos that were going around the congress until someone pointed out that they were an internet hoax dating back to 2005 or so? The congressmen who were shown the photos refused to tell us who provided them but we have to figure that they came from high placed officials in the White House. I can’t remember.. was bin Laden using his wife as a human shield and is it really customary to rush the body of a Muslim halfway across a country so you can dump it in the ocean before anyone can see it?

Let’s start with the basics on Anwar al Awlaki. President Obama says this is a major blow to al Qaeda. Hmmm….

“But in truth Mr. Awlaki is hardly significant in terms of American security. Contrary to what the Obama administration would have you believe, he has always been a minor figure in Al Qaeda, and making a big deal of him now is backfiring….

… But no one should remain under the mistaken assumption that killing Mr. Awlaki will somehow make us safer.

He is far from the terrorist kingpin that the West has made him out to be. In fact, he isn’t even the head of his own organization, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. That would be Nasir al-Wuhayshi, who was Osama bin Laden’s personal secretary for four years in Afghanistan.

Nor is Mr. Awlaki the deputy commander, a position held by Said Ali al-Shihri, a former detainee at Guantánamo Bay who was repatriated to Saudi Arabia in 2007 and put in a “terrorist rehabilitation” program. (The treatment, clearly, did not take.)

Mr. Awlaki isn’t the group’s top religious scholar (Adil al-Abab), its chief of military operations (Qassim al-Raymi), its bomb maker (Ibrahim Hassan Asiri) or even its leading ideologue (Ibrahim Suleiman al-Rubaysh).

Rather, he is a midlevel religious functionary who happens to have American citizenship and speak English. This makes him a propaganda threat, but not one whose elimination would do anything to limit the reach of the Qaeda branch.” New York Times, Nov. 19th 2010

Anwar al Awlaki was never indicted on any counts. He was never officially charged with any crime. He was not the head of any al Qaeda group nor had he made any weapons or claimed to have planned any attacks and yet he was supposedly killed on just the say-so of the “progressive’ president of this country… the president of “CHANGE”

Obama Administration: Arm al Qaeda? YES WE CAN! (archive)

(archived from March 26, 2011)

by Scott Creighton

Life in Bizzarro Post 9/11 World rolls on.

Today, the administration of our Peace Prize “winning” president is trying it’s level best to find a legal loop-hole in their precious UN resolution 1970 and 1973 which will allow them to arm former (and current) members al Qaeda in Libya.

After using their combined influence, which was substantial, Britain, France, and the United States were able to pressure the U.N. security council into passing resolutions which allowed them to impose a no-fly zone over Libya (for “humanitarian” reasons, of course) and to freeze the assets of the Libyan nationalized oil company and state owned central bank. While resolution 1973 does provide for a range of potential “humanitarian” actions, it specifically rejects three activities…

“… while excluding a (1) foreign occupation force of any form on any part of Libyan territory…”

“… Deplores the continuing flows of (2) mercenaries into the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya and calls upon all Member States to comply strictly with their obligations under paragraph 9 of resolution 1970 (2011) to prevent the provision of armed mercenary personnel to the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya…”

“… to ensure strict implementation of the (3) arms embargo established by paragraphs 9 and 10 of resolution 1970 (2011)…” UN Resolution 1973

So according to the UN resolution, the big three imperial states aren’t allowed to put their own troops on the ground in Libya (something Britain and the U.S. are reported to have already done) nor are they allowed to send (more) mercenaries into the conflict zone.  With those stipulations set into concrete international law, the only thing left for them to do to support their latest “color revolution” is to use US tax-payer dollars to pay for weapons to be handed over to the opposition forces.  Unfortunately for the imperialist coalition, arming any faction in this conflict is also prohibited by the very resolution they pushed for.

And one would think that arming former and possibly current members of al Qaeda might be frowned upon in this post 9/11 world.  According to the current administration, we can’t afford to find money for teachers and our school systems, but when it comes to giving weapons to al Qaeda for the destabilization of another country?  YES THEY CAN!

Egyptian Color Revolution Continues: Efforts to Block New Anti-neoliberal Constitution Failing (archive)

(archived from December 5, 2012)

by Scott Creighton

Contrary to popular propaganda, only 16 out of the 100 members of the assembly who wrote the new Egyptian constitution were from the Muslim Brotherhood. 16 out of 100 folks.

Egypt’s new constitution despite what you have been told, was NOT written by all Islamists and fanatical Muslim Brotherhood members hell-bent to enshrine Sharia law in Egypt. That’s just a downright lie.

It was written, in accordance with the 2011 Provisional Constitution of Egypt which itself was written by the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces of Egypt , not “Islamists”, on 30 March, 2011 in order to forge a new Egypt governed by the rule of law in the wake of the removal of our puppet dictator, Mubarak.

When you are told this document “enshrines Sharia law” and was written by the Muslim Brotherhood, that is a direct lie. Pure and simple.

They formed, according to the law, a 100 member assembly in order to write the new constitution. It is called the Constituent Assembly of Egypt and the main criticism coming from both the MSM as well as various “alternative” news sites is that it is dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood and thus they wrote the constitution. Again, not true.

“An agreement to form a more balanced assembly was reached on 7 June 2012. 39 seats would be filled by members of parliament, six by judges, nine by law experts, one each by a member of the armed forces, the police and the justice ministry, 13 seats by unions, and 21 by public figures. Five seats would be filled by the Al-Azhar University, one of Sunni Islam’s most important institutions, and four by the Coptic Orthodox Church”  BBC

The Muslim Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice Party ended up having only 16 seats in the assembly while opposition parties had 22 seats. There were 61 independents.

The Fake Color Revolution is Back in Iran – Globalist Destabilization Efforts Under Cover of Egypt’s Real Revolution (archive)

(archived from February 15, 2011)

by Scott Creighton

In every crisis, real or manufactured, there is… opportunity.

Contrary to Julian Assange’s assessment, the current wave of pro-democracy movements in the Middle East (recently called a “virus” by John McCain) was not created by the CIA honeypot called Wikileaks. Nor, as the one-time Lyndon LaRouche follower Webster Tarpley has put it, was it all a CIA destabilization plan. There are causes that track back to the United States, English banks, and Wall Street which mainly deal with accelerating food prices due to rampant speculation, a global wave of unemployment due to a planned demolition of the global economy, and the despotic dictatorial rule by U.S. and British friendly puppet regimes, so yes, you can trace the roots of these outbreaks back to the global interests the CIA serves.

But these uprisings are mainly in countries that already serve our “national interests” ie our banks and multi-national corporations and many of them are critically important to ongoing venture capital programs like Egypt (Suez Canal) and Yemen (Hunt Oil Pipeline) for starters.

So why lite those fires when the outcome is uncertain at best?

C.I.A. destabilization plans are used in countries that are not already friendly to our interests (see above) such as Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, and of course… Iran.  The differences between the real revolutions and the fake ones are very important. We cannot forget.

… the struggle against power “is the struggle of memory against forgetting.” Milan Kundera

Iran Did 9/11?: Part 1 – The Excellent Foppery of the World (archive)

(archived from December 17, 2011)

by Scott Creighton

Families of a very small percentage of the victims of 9/11 seek to steal 2 billion dollars from the people of Iran based on Donald Rumsfeld quotes, the absence of an Iranian stamp on passports given to the hijackers by the US State Department, and the hearsay testimony of an already discredited MEK terrorist.

“This is the excellent foppery of the world, that,
when we are sick in fortune,–often the surfeit
of our own behavior,–we make guilty of our
disasters the sun, the moon, and the stars: as
if we were villains by necessity; fools by
heavenly compulsion; knaves, thieves, and
treachers, by spherical predominance; drunkards,
liars, and adulterers, by an enforced obedience of
planetary influence; and all that we are evil in,
by a divine thrusting on: an admirable evasion
of whoremaster man, to lay his goatish
disposition to the charge of a star” William Shakespeare, King Lear, Edmund the Bastard, 1.2.132

Edmund the bastard lays bare the excellent foppery of the world, that as we suffer from the our own misdeeds, we find ways to lay the blame elsewhere as if by some divine plan our fate was not of our own design. The Sun (al Qaeda), the Moon (Iraq), and the Stars (Iran) have now all been blamed for what was our own invention, all that we are evil in. Thus is the nature of whore-master man.

Bush III is Upon Us. Now What? (archived from Feb 2009)

(archived from February 8, 2009)

by Scott Creighton

Let me tell you something; if you haven’t figured out by now that Obama™ isn’t on your side, you’re a fucking moron. Period.  And if you have figured it out and you got a petition in your hand or one of those stupid paper-machete Condi Rice heads on, sit down and shut the fuck up. In a “democracy” that might have worked at one time or the other (it was a nice effort, don’t get me wrong. I penned one or two petitions myself). But those days are long gone, and the last question left us, the only question the kleptocracy is asking themselves, is what are we going to do about it?

Obama™ is strengthening the state department for globalist Hillary and her IMF loving lush of a husband.

He is strengthening NSC with more “nation building” powers and talking already of backing out of the plan to remove our troops from the illegal occupation of Iraq by talking about a 23 month “exit strategy”.

I’ll give you a hint; 23 months isn’t an “exit strategy“, it’s an occupation.  Hell, we have had wars that lasted less time than that and one of them, was with Iraq.

Obama™ is keeping the Pentagon staff exactly as BushCo left it and rather than reducing their budget like he promised, he is increasing it by $40 billion. That used to be a large sum of money, before the bailout days.

Renditions?   Don’t get me started.  This is the war for “hearts and minds” fought through semantics, just like Rumsfeld and BushCo drew it up.

Is it an “extraordinary rendition” or just the good old normal “rendition”?

The Pillow Biting Alternative Media and the Johns Who Love Them (archive)

(archived from March 24, 2011)

by Scott Creighton

The “obvious humanitarian crisis” is how Hillary Clinton, proven globalist war-monger and neoliberal lick-spittle, recently justified our initial involvement in Libya. This is simply not true. It is eerily reminiscent of her speech on the senate floor in Oct. of 2002 where she quoted every single Bush/Cheney lie to persuade other democrats to vote for an illegal and immoral invasion and occupation of Iraq. This was her speech and if anyone claims, “Bush Lied People Died” they better remember Hillary’s words as well.

“In the four years since the inspectors left, “intelligence reports” (fabricated by Rumsfeld’s Office of Special Plans, run by Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith) show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological stockpiles, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear weapon program. He has also given aid, comfort and sanctuary to terrorists including al Qaeda members. It is clear however, that if left unchecked Saddam will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.” Hillary Clinton, in support of the globalist occupation and regime change in Iraq, 2002

What is painfully obvious these days is that alternative media icons are helping spread Clinton’s Karl Rovesque hawkish fantasies about Libya, just like they also helped back in the lead-up to Iraq days, in order to help justify more profitable war and the wholesale privatization of Libya which is sure to follow.

Talk about strange bedfellows. Here’s a mental picture for you; Bill Kristol going heels to Jesus on Amy Goodman with Juan Cole and John Negroponte playing “touch my wand” in the corner with a disco ball flashing overhead and “Friday” playing on the hi-fi.

Don’t like that image seared into your brain for life? Tough. That’s what happens when you work your asses off to support the moderate “Obama agenda“. Why not get Arianna and Stewart to do another “Everything is Just Fine… for Some of Us” march on Washington with C3PO and a midget in a robot costume. That’ll make you feel better about the Obama betrayal.

Going back over all the MSM and “progressive” left’s neocon-like pro-war PR spin, you find one thing is consistent time and time again and that is that each reported “atrocity” comes straight from a rebel “witness” with no video or photographs to back them up.  Or you had real atrocities carried out by people like the “yellow hats” who were clearly not Gadhafi’s soldiers or police, but rather rebel supporters in civilian looking clothes but with these silly yellow hard-hats running around beating peaceful protesters in full view of rebel video cameras which had been set up prior to the PR event. Later they used videos of fighting between Gadhafi’s police and the “rebels” as “evidence” of the make-believe slaughter, forgetting to mention that any police or military unit is going to defend itself when a small faction of capitalist sponsored thugs attack them in the open with automatic weapons and even heavier equipment.

It’s one lie after another lie, followed up by a half-truth, and then some outright propaganda, served up with a heart warming shot of self-righteous self-satisfaction. A recipe for war promotion dating back to the Greeks and probably back to cave dwellers who’ s chief wanted to profit from grabbing the beads of the neighboring tribes.

Globalist Puppet Luis Moreno-Ocampo Issues ICC Arrest Warrant for Gadhafi based on “Activists Say” Evidence (archive)

(archived from June 27, 2011)

by Scott Creighton

In March of this year, a globalist puppet was tasked with finding some reason to force Moammar Gadhafi out of power in Libya so their pro-western, monarchist “rebels” could take power. Luis Moreno-Ocampo took his charge seriously and declare before any investigation that he was “100% certain” that he would find “crimes against humanity” charges for the Libyan leader. Ocampo found his “evidence” by listening to whatever so-called “activists” made up with no supporting physical evidence of any kind.

Today those charges were turned into official arrest warrants.

“The International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued an arrest warrant for Libyan ruler Muammar Gaddafi on charges of committing crimes against humanity.

… The warrants are a response to ICC chief prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo’s call on the court to issue arrest warrants for the three influential Libyan figures.” Press TV

Remember, in May of 2002, in order to keep U.S. officials from being tried for war crimes and crimes against humanity by the I.C.C., the Bush administration officially withdrew America’s intent of ratification of the I.C.C. Treaty.

In that letter of withdrawal, Donald Rumsfeld, at the time the Secretary of Defense and quite possibly a potential target of criminal investigation, stated…

“There is a lack of adequate checks and balances on the powers of ICC prosecutors and judges. The treaty dilutes the U.N. Security Council’s authority over international criminal prosecutions” Armed forces Press Service

Chuck Hagel Warned Obama About the “New World Order” and Told Him to “Question What the Military is Being Used For” (archive)

(archived from November 25, 2014)

by Scott Creighton

Sec. of Defense Chuck Hagel has been fired by President Obama. He was on record calling Bush’s surge in Afghanistan and Iraq “the most dangerous foreign policy blunder in this country since Vietnam.”

Recently, Barack Obama has renewed the “surge” in both Iraq and Afghanistan with the latter being of the stealth variety. No “ISIS” in that country to blame.

Is it any wonder that President Peace Prize had to fire his anti-war Sec. of Defense while turning himself into a cheap copy of raging chicken-hawk John McCain?

Curiously it seems Sec. Hagel was a bit of a conspiracy theorist. According to Bob Woodward (take it for whatever it’s worth) Chuck visited the new president back in 2009 and had some words of advice for him:

“We are at a time where there is a new world order. We don’t control it. You must question everything, every assumption, everything they” — the military and diplomats — “tell you. Any assumption 10 years old is out of date. You need to question our role. You need to question the military. You need to question what are we using the military for. Afghanistan will be defining for your presidency in the first term,” Hagel also said, according to his own account, “perhaps even for a second term.” The key was not to get “bogged down.” Chuck Hagel in 2009 reported by Bob Woodward Jan. 2013

So it would appear Chucky understands what we “tinfoil hats” understand: that these empty suits like Obama and Bush before him, don’t really control anything, they’re just pitchmen for policies made way above their pay-grade.

Globalist Servant John Kiriakou: Torture, Lies and 9/11 - Is the Left Stupid or Just Corrupt? (archive)

(archived from March 22, 2013)

by Scott Creighton

       --- ------ UPDATE:

ROSS: So in your view, the waterboarding broke him?

KIRIAKOU: I think it did, yes.

ROSS:  And did it make a difference in terms of…

KIRIAKOU: It did. The threat information that he provided disrupted a number of attacks, maybe dozens of attacks.

ROSS: And bottom line, as you sit here now, do you think that was worth it?

KIRIAKOU: Yes.

                     ----------- see more UPDATES at end of article -------------

Code Pink’s song to Global Free Market Wars advocate and admitted CIA liar and Mockingbird with ABC News John Kiriakou. The song is called “Have You Been to Jail for Justice?”

Do you know John Kiriakou?

Well, he’s a friend of mine.

Blew the whistle on the CIA

And now he’s doin’ time.

Ah, no. He’s no friend of mine and he shouldn’t be yours.

Why are so-called “anti-war” and “anti-torture” activists dancing around a CIA spook who is a known liar and proved to be a major contributor to the mythology that torture works? Why are they celebrating a man who by all accounts is knee deep in the Global Free Market Wars being waged for his mergers and acquisitions clients?

Is Code Pink just that stupid or is it something else?

Dutch MH-17 Report Seems to Imply Kiev Downed the Plane, Not Russia (archive)

(archived from October 13, 2015)

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE: This study shows through a couple of real world experiments, that the plane was downed by an older version of the Russian-made rocket and not the newer one Russia uses today. Kiev still has and uses the older systems and if you look below in the article, you will see photos of them posted by Kiev military forces in the area at the time of the shoot-down (second photo of BUK systems and rockets in the collection below.

 

—–

Dutch authorities have finally released their much awaited report on the downing of Malaysian Airlines Flight MH-17 and have concluded that the plane was shot down by a BUK missile system and more specifically, a “Russian made” 9N314 fragmentation warhead found on the 9M38 missile.

Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 was downed by a Russian-made “warhead” fired from eastern Ukraine that detonated outside the jet’s cockpit, Dutch investigators confirmed in their final report Tuesday. NBC “news”

This of course is being used as “proof positive” to suggest Russia had some involvement in the downing of the plane by at least supplying the munitions and BUK system to rebels in Eastern Ukraine fighting against our puppet regime in Kiev.

Imagine that. More Russia bashing as they are wiping out our CIA-backed terrorists in Syria.

You can expect a resurgence of the story of Russia driving BUKs into Ukraine to shoot down commercial jets I suppose. What you wont see repeated is the story of the Ukrainian BUK 312 crew member saying that crap is a lie.

Unfortunately for folks who have a bit more information at their disposal, the conclusion doesn’t really point to Russia or the separatists at all and in fact, this conclusion is not really news. A study by the Russian manufacturer of the system came to the same conclusion back in June.

The Ukrainian military had in it’s possession several BUK missile systems armed with these exact same rockets and even posted bragging videos of them deploying them in the area just prior to the downing of Flight MH-17 and just after it.

So, who does this Dutch report cast blame on? Well, minus the invisible Russian invasion of eastern Ukraine, it seems to me that it places blame for the downing of the jet firmly on the side of our neo-Nazis in Kiev.

A Russian defence firm says an old Buk missile it used to manufacture brought down Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 over eastern Ukraine on 17 July 2014.

The Almaz-Antey firm said the Buk M1 guided missile was fired from an area south of Zaroshchenske….

There is controversy about who controlled the Zaroshchenske area at the time. The Russian military said the town was under Ukrainian military control, whereas Ukrainian officials insisted it was already held by the rebels.

Almaz-Antey said it had analysed shrapnel damage and identified the missile as “9M38M1 of the Buk M1 system” BBC June 2, 2015

So it has already been well established that the missile that brought down Flight MH-17 was probably a 9M38 fired from a BUK system.

Does the fact that the system is Russian made mean the rebels in Donbas did the deed? Hardly.

My Take on the Poroshenko VS Kolomoyskyi Mini-War in Ukraine (archive)

(archived from March 26, 2015)

by Scott Creighton

I keep reading the work of so-called “alternative” journalists like Eric Zuesse who are apparently trying to portray Israeli citizen, banker and multi-billionaire Ihor Valeriyovych Kolomoyskyi as some kind of legitimate alternative to Obama’s man in Kiev, Petro “Porky” Poroshenko.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

The mental gymnastics people like Zuesse have to go through while making this claim are mind boggling.

The complicit corporate media here in the states are already starting to demonize Poroshenko, with one that I noticed the other day referring to him as the ‘self styled” president of Ukraine. Thus the de-legitimization process begins.

In reality, he was “elected” in one small area which voted against the former legitimate president of the country which Obama got rid of when he looked to sign a deal keeping Ukraine out of the EU and NATO.

But as far as leaders aligned with the White House goes, that’s about as legit as they get.

Ihor Kolomoyskyi is on a quest to overthrow our puppet junta in Kiev. Of this there is no doubt. So does that make him automatically opposed by ObamaGod and the CIA and Western interests?

But let’s take a moment to look at the facts before reacting in some “alternative’ knee-jerk fashion.

Our “Glued Together” Client State of Neoliberals and Neo-Nazis in Ukraine is Falling Apart (archive)

(archived from August 28, 2014)

by Scott Creighton

President Peace Prize’s neoliberal client-state in Kiev is coming apart at the seams. The color revolution that Victoria Nuland built at a cost of 5 billion dollars has failed to win the hearts and minds of the citizens of the former Soviet Republic and the police state repression that they needed to subdue the masses has come up woefully short. Ergo, President Peace Prize needs another justification for yet another “humanitarian intervention” in order to save Kiev’s dictator from the angry mob that is Ukraine.

“The Russians are coming! THE RUSSIANS ARE COMING!!!!”

“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.” Edward Bernays

In spite of what you are being told by the likes of Disinfo Jones, the Huffington Post and Fox “News”… the Russians are not invading Ukraine. Notice you have the same propaganda being promoted across the full spectrum of “news” sites from the fake alternative to the fake left to the hard-core right. It’s all some variation of the same bullshit lies.

Why?

Well that’s simple… Kiev is getting it’s ass kicked by the militias from the east. Their troops are fleeing when they encounter any resistance leaving behind heavy weaponry for the rebels to claim as their own. Their citizenry is demanding resignations.

• Aug. 25th – Ukraine President dissolves parliament, paves way for early election – “The decision comes because “the majority of the MPs voted for dictator-style laws,” which cost the lives of Maidan activists… On August 2, Poroshenko again spoke of a snap parliamentary election after the Rada refused to recognize the self-proclaimed Lugansk and Donetsk People’s Republics as terrorist groups. “

• Aug. 28th – Kiev protesters demand resignation of Ukrainian president, defense minister – “Hundreds of people have gathered in front of the Ukrainian Defense Ministry in Kiev, demanding resignation of President Petro Poroshenko and the defense minister over the poor handling of the military operation in the southeast.”

• Aug. 28th – East Ukraine militias seize large amount of Ukrainian armor — Kiev’s hacked data – “CyberBerkut anonymous hacker group released a new portion of the Ukrainian army’s hacked data on Thursday, showing large losses inflicted by east Ukraine militias on pro-Kiev troops… “Therefore, our estimates alone show that the defenders of the Luhansk and Donetsk People’s Republics seized 79 T-64 tanks, 94 infantry fighting vehicles, 57 armored personnel carriers and 24 Grad multiple launch rocket”

• Aug. 28th – ““The only thing we know is that the mayor of Novoazovsk said that after 10 artillery shots Ukrainian servicemen fled the town and militiamen entered it,”

Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko is a desperate man. He was installed by western leaders on behalf of institutions like the EU, the IMF and Monsanto. That’s a lot of pressure.

Obama’s Sec. of State Refuses to Recognize Democracy… Once Again (archive)

(archived from March 14, 2014)

by Scott Creighton

America’s war on democracy continues unabated. When the people speak, when they say they want no part of our “managed democracy” anymore, well, our glorious leaders speak out against them and simply refuse to accept the will of the people no matter where those people are. After all, they are trying in the way of glorious profits and Mammon simply wont have any part of allowing that.

The doublespeak in Washington these days is so transparent a child could understand it for what it really is.

After the thugs and the neo-Nazi goons did the work of Washington’s NGOs destabilizing the country with brutality because the vast majority of people in Ukraine didn’t want anything to do with either joining the European Union or a massive debt inducing IMF loans, the Obama White House came forward voicing support for the “wishes of the Ukrainian people”.

Leadership in Ukraine offered early elections and power-sharing, even going so far as to voluntarily remove the elected president. But that wasn’t good enough for the thugs who clawed their way into office along with a bunch of Chicago Boys-type technocrats who are already busily carving up the country to hand it over to the masters of the universe. Ukraine’s oligarchs have been installed in the east of the country and new feudal lords ruling over a population which would NEVER have elected them in a million years.

This is what Barack Obama considers standing up for the people of Ukraine.

In Crimea on Sunday it’s going to be put to the people as too whether or not they wish to remain linked to Ukraine or rejoin the former Soviet Union, Russia.

The results of this vote are easily predicted. Everyone knows the vast majority of the population in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea are Russians and that is where there loyalty lies.

So, in anticipation of the vote, of the will of the people being recorded this time, unlike in Ukraine where violence and mayhem prevented any such indication, our glorious leaders are jumping out ahead of it saying they will not recognize such a vote in any way and in fact, they condemn it.

President Obama Pitches CFR Plan: Looks to Bring the India Model of GM Genocide to Africa (archive)

(archived from May 20, 2012)

by Scott Creighton

(H/T Kenny’s sideshow)

“The Clinton Foundation fighting global issues through business oriented solutions. The Clinton Foundation is the best world in the world.” propaganda video featuring Jack Black

“We are never going to end hunger in Africa without private investment,” USAID

“The structure of fascism is the union, marriage, merger or fusion of corporate economic power with governmental power” David Mills

President Obama has announced his big initiative to save the starving people of Africa by “unleashing the powers of the market” all across their continent. 

It’s called the New Alliance for Food and Nutrition Security. Obama has made this announcement at a G8 summit meeting at Camp David (created back in the 1930′s under the Works Progress Administration part of the New Deal) hosted by none other than the Chicago Council on Foreign Affairs. You may remember them. They changed their name back in 2008 when it was inconvenient for the wife of the next president to be affiliated with the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations.

But African civil society wants no part of this latest Monsanto aligned “public private partnership”. Whatever will the progressives do now that their flawless hero has teamed up with their most hated nemesis to exploit an entire continent like they did to India not that long ago?

The Miracle of America (archived from 2007)

(archived from Oct. 5 2007)

by Scott Creighton

By every right this President and his corrupt administration should have been impeached and then incarcerated years ago. But what do you expect from a group of people that we have, by concession, allowed to steal the White House, not once… but twice?

In Chile in 1973, when Nixon and the Chicago Boys wanted to implement the Friedman Doctrine of savage capitalism as a test case, their candidate also lost the free election to Salvador Allende and therefore they had too resort to a military coup to install the Augusto Pinochet led junta.

“Pinochet assumed power on Sept. 11, 1973, in a bloody coup supported by the United States that toppled the elected government of Salvador Allende, a Marxist who had pledged to lead his country "down the democratic road to socialism." Washington Post, Dec. 2006.

Chile was not simply drawn out of a hat in a random manner as the nation where this test case would take place. No, the ousted ruler (freely elected President Allende) had been in power for over two years and had been enacting sweeping social and economic reforms through-out the nation. He had nationalized the banking systems and monetary systems as well as the main national export; copper.

“In 1970, Salvadore Allende became the first Marxist to be democratically elected president in the Western hemisphere. In the course of his sweeping socialist reforms, he nationalized not only the copper mines but banks and other foreign-owned assets as well.” Chile: The Laboratory Test.

The copper mines had been bought up in the 60s by vast US corporations, and of course the banking systems had been held by US interests as well. So when Nixon was elected he owed some of these multinational interests some payback and since he wasn’t about to force the Friedman economic model down the throats of the American people, having then stated “We are all Keynesians now.” he threw them Chile as a sort of consolation prize. 

The truth about Israel's secret nuclear arsenal

from The Guardian

Deep beneath desert sands, an embattled Middle Eastern state has built a covert nuclear bomb, using technology and materials provided by friendly powers or stolen by a clandestine network of agents. It is the stuff of pulp thrillers and the sort of narrative often used to characterise the worst fears about the Iranian nuclear programme. In reality, though, neither US nor British intelligence believe Tehran has decided to build a bomb, and Iran's atomic projects are under constant international monitoring.

The exotic tale of the bomb hidden in the desert is a true story, though. It's just one that applies to another country. In an extraordinary feat of subterfuge, Israel managed to assemble an entire underground nuclear arsenal – now estimated at 80 warheads, on a par with India and Pakistan – and even tested a bomb nearly half a century ago, with a minimum of international outcry or even much public awareness of what it was doing.

Despite the fact that the Israel's nuclear programme has been an open secret since a disgruntled technician, Mordechai Vanunu, blew the whistle on it in 1986, the official Israeli position is still never to confirm or deny its existence.

When the former speaker of the Knesset, Avraham Burg, broke the taboo last month, declaring Israeli possession of both nuclear and chemical weapons and describing the official non-disclosure policy as "outdated and childish" a rightwing group formally called for a police investigation for treason.

Meanwhile, western governments have played along with the policy of "opacity" by avoiding all mention of the issue. In 2009, when a veteran Washington reporter, Helen Thomas, asked Barack Obama in the first month of his presidency if he knew of any country in the Middle East with nuclear weapons, he dodged the trapdoor by saying only that he did not wish to "speculate"...

read more here

More Bullshit from Obama™ (archive)

(archived from willyloman on February 2, 2009)

by Scott Creighton

When Obama picked Tom Daschle to be the HHS Secretary, I nearly shit my pants. In Washington there are whores and there are whores, and then there is Tom Daschle. Tom Daschle would suck off a corpse for a cheeseburger. Matt Taibbi

It would appear that Barack O’Bush is just going to continue in the same fashion as the previous administration; making glorious statements and rules that all of his supporters cheer as “Change”, and then just go right on doing the exact same thing anyway, knowing full well that the majority of his supporters won’t believe it and that the story (if covered at all) will die out soon enough anyway.

Mr. Obama has said that no one in his administration who has lobbied on a set of issues within the past two years can deal with the same subject matter. The president has already approved a few exceptions. CBS News

Aside from being a wealthy tax-cheat who would have gone to jail for his actions, had he been anyone BUT a connected politician, apparently Tom Daschle, Obama’s pick for Health and Human Services secretary, was a well paid member of a lobbying firm that worked for the very industries that he would be dealing with everyday.

NDAA 2012 From Presidential Signing Statements to Domestic Irregular Warfare - Here's What I Know

 

Someone asked about NDAA 2012. Here's what I know about it and what you should as well.