Why Didn't Artemis II Take Photos of All the Gear We Left Behind 50 Years Ago?

Because we left that stuff in a studio in Nevada, not on the moon.

Direct Support 

Artemis II sent up close images of the moon

by Scott Creighton

And guess what? Didn't see any of the stuff we supposedly left there all those years ago. Kinda hard to miss since the moon really isn't that big especially the side that faces us. 

Moon Landing and Covid-19 Psyops are Falling Apart... just not fast enough

Truth is slipping thru the cracks. It always does. 

'This is the BEGINNING of Humans Leaving Low Earth Orbit' NASA Astronaut on ISS

Yeah, they're now saying the quiet part out loud. Moon landings were faked. Obviously. They don't want the first person to actually set foot on the moon to be robbed of their place in history.

 

Why It’s So Challenging to Land Upright on the Moon

(Back in the day we could ignore the Van Allen belt's radiation (something we are very concerned about today) and land upright on the moon with no problems (something we don't seem to be able to do today)  Are NASA scientists just dumber than they used to be? Should we dump all the super computers and go back to the shit they had back then with less computing power than your average cell phone?  Gee... its almost as if... we had never actually been there in the first place)

from NYT

When the robotic lander Odysseus last month became the first American-built spacecraft to touch down on the moon in more than 50 years, it toppled over at an angle. That limited the amount of science it could do at the lunar surface, because its antennas and solar panels were not pointed in the correct directions.

Just a month earlier, another spacecraft, the Smart Lander for Investigating Moon, or SLIM, sent by the Japanese space agency, had also tipped during landing, ending up on its head.

Why is there a sudden epidemic of spacecraft rolling on the moon like Olympic gymnasts performing floor routines? Is it really that difficult to land upright there?

On the internet and elsewhere, people pointed to the height of the Odysseus lander — 14 feet from the bottom of the landing feet to the solar arrays at the top — as a contributing factor for its off-kilter touchdown...

read more here

Artemis 1 Main Purpose to Study Radiation Exposure and Other Wins

Yeah I am taking a victory lap. Shit happens. It's Sunday. Cut me some slack.

'To the MOON and BEYOND!!!' NASA: 'MARS, bitches!' Dave Chappelle

 

NASA says we are going 'back' to the moon. They are sending a ship this weekend to scout it out I guess and fly in moon orbit a couple times then come back, thru Van Allen, and give us info... for a trip we have done several times already. NASA says the proof that Van Allen is not dangerous is in how low radiation levels were in Apollo astronauts. Guess what? They never flew thru it.  

Some Pentagon Truth and a Van Allen Theory

Some Pentagon Truth and a Van Allen Theory

Has Man Ever Set Foot on the Moon??

Moon Landing Hoax: Waving Flags and Face Shield Reflections - Connected?

by Scott Creighton

This is just a quick little photo essay for you.

Remember the Apollo 11 flag waving issue? The video broadcast to the world in July of 1969 purported to show two astronauts planting the U.S. flag on the surface of the moon. It was quite an achievement of propaganda and literal flag waving... but folks soon noticed the flag was waving when it shouldn't be waving because there was atmosphere on the moon and thus, no wind.

Did you know they cut out the scene of them planting the flag in the new movie First Man? Curious huh?

There was no video taken from the surface of the moon during Apollo 12 and by time they got to Apollo 15... they had fixed that little problem. Kind of.

I watched a documentary about the moon landing hoax and I saw an image, we've all seen it, the one where something is reflected in the astronaut's visor on the front of his helmet. This image.

See the thing suspended in the air above the image of the guy taking the picture? Some say it's something off the lander but the lander is in the picture behind the subject. So what is it?

The video I watched thought it was a lighting instrument with "barn door" shutters, typical of the kind used in studios back then.

I thought "that doesn't look like a fernel or another lighting instrument... to me, that looks like something else you would find in a big studio or warehouse...

To me, that looks like a ceiling fan.

Back in those days when air-conditioning a space as large as a film studio or warehouse wasn't cost effective, they would have ceiling fans in them that kept the air moving and circulating. Plus they are a lot quieter than the old large a/c units and could keep them running while filming, since it was essentially a silent movie they were making.

Their "sun" lighting source had to produce a ton of heat and so they would need to keep the fans running that were out of the shot so technicians and off camera talent didn't suffer from heat stroke.

This would have the effect of moving the air in the studio and perhaps is what cause the flags to wave in the earlier footage they shot of Apollo 11 and 15 but it wouldn't be enough to blow the dust around.

I guess that could be a lighting instrument but since there is no hot-spot and it doesn't have the shape of the "barn door" shutters... I think, more likely, they accidentally shot an image that answers the question so many people had about what actually caused the flags to wave on the surface of the moon.

And the answer was: ceiling fans.

You wonder why they left out the flag planting scene in the new movie? Is it because they wanted it to represent an accomplishment for "all of mankind" like the actor said? Or is it because they didn't want youngsters being fed a new batch of nationalized mythology to look up the original flag planting video?

Or maybe it's simply because... its hot in that studio and the devas on the set didn't want to turn off the ceiling fans.

:)

NASA Admits We Never Went to the Moon (Better Mankind video)