(Let me get this straight:
- there was a massive DDOS attack on the official election site of Venezuela that prevented them from publishing the official results
- the opposition claiming Gonzalez won 70+% of the vote decided to skip the Supreme Court hearing refusing to submit their fraudulent 'evidence'
- the opposition now claims their 'evidence' of election rigging isn't actually theirs and they have no idea who put it on their bullshit website. The same evidence even the ALT-LEFT here in the States have used to say Maduro must go
Is that about the size of it?)
from TeleSUR
The Supreme Court of Justice (TSJ) of Venezuela announced this Saturday
that it will review documents submitted by political organizations and
former candidates to make a decision at the end of the “validation”
process of the elections on July 28, whose result confirmed the victory
of President Nicolás Maduro.
“The judges of this Electoral Chamber are committed to the expertise
of all the electoral material of probative value recorded in physical
and/or digital, as well as to the expertise on the massive cyber attack
that was the object of the Venezuelan electoral system” said the judges
declaration.
The judge recalled that the candidate of the main opposition
coalition, the Democratic Unitarian Platform (PUD), Edmundo González
Urrutia, was the only one of the ten candidates who did not appear
before the TSJ for this process requested by the re-elected president
Nicolas Maduro.
In addition, Caryslia Rodríguez stated that the citizens Manuel
Rosales, representative of Un Nuevo Tiempo (UNT), José Luis Cartaya, of
the Mesa de la Unidad Democrática (MUD) and José Simón Calzadilla, of
the Movimiento por Venezuela (MPV), all members of the United Platform
for Democratic Democracy and candidates of former candidate González
Urrutia did not register any electoral material, arguing that they do
not have any documentation related to this electoral process.
The judge added that they stated that they do not have records of the
counting of witnesses at the tables, nor lists of witnesses, Further
arguing that they did not participate in the process of transferring and
storing any material and were unaware of who uploaded the information
of the alleged voting records on the website...
read more here