(I don't know who wrote back in 2018, I'm sorry. I had no idea it was written. A very nice and thorough analysis of my work on 9/11 demolition theory. Outstanding even. All the links are broken, however, I would guess you can find each article by using the link and the Way Back Machine. Thank you very much, whomever you are. Looks like the author stopped posting around July 2023. Hope you see this. Thanks again. Good work.)
from KapitalGate
Mr. Creighton’s hypothesis, authored over many articles, argues that the Towers were destroyed “via conventional demolition, and that during the design stages of the process, the conspirators relied too heavily on the use of detonation cord in the floor systems, which led to the vaporization of most of the truss systems. This was accidentally revealed (the “iron microspheres”) when the RJ Lee Group did their Composition and Morphology study of the Ground Zero dust samples for Deutsche Bank.”
PETN/RDX is a good candidate because these are the most commonly used hi-explosives in the industry. They have a long, studied history and are generally reliable. It’s sensible to start with the most plausible hypothesis (conventional hi-explosives) first, and failing that, move onto testing more exotic hypotheses.
Primaline 85 detonator cord would be used to pulverize the concrete, and also to remove the building’s lateral support supplied by the double-bridged long trusses. RDX cutter and kicker charges would be used to cut columns down to a specific length (every three floors is a common estimate from what I’ve read), and then ‘kick’ those columns out of the way from the proceeding downward collapse. Refer to article three, “Demolition Hypothesis”, for further details on the demolition sequence.
Background Reading if interested (Chronological Order):..
read more here
If you go to the site's "About" page, the Twitter link says the author's acct there is @northwoods_memo.
ReplyDeleteHey Scott. I'm still active on social media. I'm the one who published the summary of your explosives hypothesis. I have a compilation of your articles in a single PDF file as well. There was someone who extended your hypothesis slightly, except they were still believing the nano-thermite nonsense and believed that the conspirators were blowing thermite "dust" into the electrical ducts that were drilled into the concrete slabs, lol.
ReplyDeleteThis commentator said something VERY astute, though. He said that on the morning of 9/11, none of the fire control panels in the lobbies of the WTC Towers were working... "for some reason". He hypothesized that the fire control systems in the lobbies were used to carry Internet instructions from a nearby building to the WTC, to start the demo sequence, blow the floors consecutively and set off the explosives in the correct sequence..likely created by a custom computer program. This was at the dawn of early internet communication, and apparently several of the fire control systems were "upgraded" after the 1993 WTC bombings.
Using traditional RF frequencies/radio control would have been too risky because the massive steel columns would have formed a Faraday cage of sorts, blocking reception (similar to how 3-watt cell signals can't penetrate the aluminum skin of an airplane) . But with a networked connection, everything could have been wired right inside of the electrical rooms without anybody raising suspicion. The incoming line could've been a simple telephone wire, as that was used at the time for high-speed internet (or CAT5 cables, I guess). This is all according to him, and I'm no expert, but it sounds very plausible to me at first glance.
There's a disturbing parallel of the example he conjured up, though. On the morning of 9/11, there was a veteran U.S. Army Signal Corps specialist who was walking between a COMPUTER ROOM and FIRST-FLOOR TELEPHONE CLOSET while completing inspections of an malfunctioning air conditioning system inside the computer room. That's his alibi, anyway. He was doing this for a few minutes prior to ""Flight 77" allegedly hitting the Pentagon. The Mossad also sent a detonation signal down a telephone wire to assassinate a suspected PLO militant in 1971. So this is really isn't even new stuff, just implemented in a more clever way on 9/11.
I'll post this comment on your YouTube channel as well, just to ensure your chances of seeing it.
Good to see you again.
Dave