Sunday, August 18, 2024

Some Bullshit about WHO Vaxxes in Africa

By Scott Creighton 

Dr. Meryl Nass is reporting the effort to get 'novel' vaccines into Africa has begun yet in her article she fails to specifically name the two vaccines approved by the WHO or how they would be qualified as 'novel' when BOTH have been around and approved for use for YEARS.


 Meryl Nass https://merylnass.substack.com/p/its-begun-the-effort-to-get-novel

It's begun: the effort to get novel vaccines (?) into Africans 

As you know, two vaccines for mpox are recommended by WHO’s Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization, and are also approved by WHO-listed national regulatory authorities, as well as by individual countries including Nigeria and the DRC.' Tedros
CDC: Two vaccines may be used to prevent mpox:

JYNNEOS is a third-generation vaccine based on a live, attenuated orthopoxvirus, Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA). MVA is a live virus that does not replicate efficiently in humans. JYNNEOS is known internationally as Imvamune® or Imvanex®; it is manufactured by Bavarian Nordic. It is fully licensed in the U.S. for subcutaneous administration in individuals 18 years of age and older. As of April 1, 2024, JYNNEOS is commercially available in the U.S.

... the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in August 2022 to allow JYNNEOS vaccine to be used...

ACAM2000 is a second-generation vaccine that contains a live vaccinia virus that replicates efficiently in humans. It is manufactured by Emergent Bio Solutions and is indicated for the prevention of smallpox. It has been made available for use against mpox in the current outbreak under an Expanded Access Investigational New Drug (EA-IND) protocol, which requires informed consent along with completing additional forms. Available evidence supporting the use of smallpox vaccine for mpox prevention is derived from experience with Dryvax®, the vaccine used during smallpox eradication. Dryvax was a first-generation smallpox vaccine manufactured by Wyeth Laboratories. Routine use of this vaccine ended in the United States in 1972, and smallpox was declared eradicated globally in 1980 by the World Health Assembly. The license for Dryvax was withdrawn in 2008 and no supplies of this vaccine remain. Although the United States has a large supply of ACAM2000, this vaccine has more side effects and contraindications than JYNNEOS.' CDC

One is a third gen attenuated virus vax and the other is a second gen live virus vax. NEITHER are what you would call 'novel vaccines' and as far as I can tell, they are the ones the WHO approves for use in Africa. Neither are mRNA 'novel' vaccines. ACAM2000 has been around for a while used to prevent smallpox but now using it to prevent MPOX doesn't make it 'novel' (MPOX is Orthopoxvirus genus in the Poxviridae family like smallpox) and Jynneos just has a new name on an existing vaccine. Also not 'novel'

Back in Mar of 2023 the WHO had THREE vaccines on their approved list for use to prevent the spread of MPOX. What happened to the other one, I don't know.

'Currently, three vaccines are available, one second generation (ACAM2000 (Emergent Biosolutions)) and two third generation vaccines (modified vaccinia virus (MVA)-BN (Jynneos/Imvanex/Imvamune; Bavarian Nordic) and Lc16m8 (KM-Biologics)). WHO interim guidance published in November 2022 contains information on mpox vaccine safety)...

The safety profile of ACAM2000 includes risks for myocarditis and pericarditis and many of the risks associated with replication-competent smallpox vaccines. The safety of the third-generation vaccine, MVA-BN, has been assessed in 22 clinical trials that included over 7800 participants aged ≥18 years. Similar rates of adverse events (AEs) in vaccinia-naïve and previously vaccinated individuals were observed. The safety of this vaccine has been assessed in special populations (e.g., HIV, atopic dermatitis, children, pregnant and breastfeeding women) with no safety concerns identified, however, the size of the study samplea were small. The safety assessment of intradermal administration of the MVA-BN vaccine showed an increased rate of local reactogenicity reactions. The second third-generation vaccine, Lc16m8, has been used mainly in Japan, and two recent studies in Japan and USA reported no safety concerns.

The post marketing data available for MVA-BN (Jynneos) show no safety concerns but there are gaps in knowledge on safety and benefit-risk and more data are needed for specific populations, such as children, pregnant women, populations outside of USA, Europe and Australia, immunocompromised populations and those previously vaccinated.' WHO 2023

Perhaps I am confused by what she means by 'novel' but it would certainly have helped had she listed the vaccines approved by the WHO so we could do our research and formulate our own opinions.

Again, the most recent listing I could find from the WHO shows THREE having been approved a year ago and I am only guessing that the TWO they now accept for distribution align with what the CDC approves. But that is an assumption.

In a follow-up article Nass mentions the same two I mentioned from the CDC presumably because she found they are the ones the WHO has approved for distribution in Africa.

Again, both have been around for a while though one was used to treat smallpox and not MPOX so does she suggest the new crossover application qualifies as a 'novel' use of an established vaccine?

Seems like this is a money-grab and a chance for the WHO to create a much needed crisis in order to push for their PLANDEMIC treaty rather than some new round of testing 'novel' vaccines. But who knows.


2 comments:

  1. Same parallel going on in another "the science is proved" mega-scam fraud here in the GMO plant/insecticide "science" .
    BOTH operate and perpetuate themselves on the proven corporo-fascist "just make up shit as you go" money mill model.

    very key benchmark study out recently got it thru jeffrey smith's e-mail here repeat it should save it!

    https://gmwatch.org/en/106-news/latest-news/20442
    GM Bt corn fails against target pest in US
    Published: 24 July 2024
    ONE SICK FEAUD LIE THEY/VE BEEN FOISTING FOREVER:
    GMO advocates such as the GMO industry-funded Genetic Literacy Project often point to the meta-analysis by Pellegrino et al, which states that over 20 years of data confirm that GM corn increases yields. However, much of the field data used in the meta-analysis dates from the early 2000s, before pest resistance to Bt toxins kicked in.

    The study found that the combination of non-GM seed and management practices used by Western Europe was increasing maize yields faster – with less pesticide use – than the GM-led package chosen by the US. An updated analysis of FAO data by the New York Times in 2016 confirmed Heinemann et al's findings.

    THEN THIS "THE SCIENCE IS PROVED" idea they just pulled out of their asses that doesn't work as they thought it would to cover up a 'defect' in their 'proved science'!:
    Did i say "just make shit up as you go"?

    Refuge-in-a-bag "accelerates resistance"
    The idea is that the non-Bt corn plants will allow a a Bt toxin-susceptible population of the insect pest to be maintained and mate with the Bt-resistant insects, leading to Bt-susceptible offspring.

    However, Prof Reisig says, “Refuge in a bag actually accelerates resistance.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Big red x pained on his door won't help!
    Apparently drones don't have to conform to the rules of passover.

    🚨HIZBULLAH DRONE OVER NETANYAHU’S HOUSE! | AQB DESTROY IOF IN GAZA
    Mahmood OD | محمود عودة
    5K views 53 minutes ago
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKeeT7IxKmw

    ReplyDelete