Moments After 'Plane' Hit Pentagon Before Collapse of Wall

by Scott Creighton

Hunt the Boeing. Where is it? Do you see anything to suggest a massive 757-200 hit the Pentagon on September 11 2001? Tail section would have crumpled and broken off and been outside the building. That wall was steel reinforced concrete and stone. Where are the wings? Luggage? Anything?

 

There is nothing to suggest a commercial airliner hit the Pentagon right in the section where Donald Rumsfeld says they were looking for the missing 2.3 trillion dollars just the day before 9/11. What a coincidence.

Serious Problems With Jim Hoffman’s “A Hypothetical Blasting Scenario ” Makes His Recent Essay Far From “Plausible” (archive)

(I post this as a reminder of just how convoluted the 'thermite' distraction was from the very beginning.)

(Ceiling tile bombs. Yeah. Ceiling tile bombs.)

(archived from April 4, 2009)

by Scott Creighton

Jim Hoffman has just published his essay ” A Hypothetical Blasting Scenario:  A Plausible Theory Explaining the Controlled Demolition of the Twin Towers Using Aluminothermic Incendiaries and Explosives with Wireless Ignition Means” in time for it to coincide with the new Jones et al piece, “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe” and quite frankly, Hoffmans work is structurally unsound.

I don’t want to get too far into a critical review of Hoffmans work till I can wrap my head around what Jones’ paper concludes and that is mainly because Hoffman’s efforts are largely based on giving what he thinks is a practical application for the hypothesis of aluminothermic controlled demolition of the Trade Centers.  Clearly understanding more about the new Steven Jones work is key to validating Hoffman’s theory.

I am currently working through the Jones effort as you will see in a moment.

But Hoffman’s “Plausible” theory is a horse of a different color. It would appear that he may have been too eager to get a working demolition theory out there at the same time Jones released his research.

His “Plausible” theory and his conclusions need a lot more work.

Niels Harrit is a Weasel. He’s the Back-Stabbing Fredo of the Truth Family (archive)

(archived from August 2, 2009)

by Scott Creighton

***UPDATE*** anyone want to join in on the conversation? We are having an interesting chat on the comments section… jump right in folks…

Just look at him.  He’s a weasel.

Disinfo specialist, red-chip peddling, snake oil salesman.  What he and Jones have done to the “Truth” movement is criminal. Their ridiculous claim about the “thermetic” material (that’s not even a WORD people) kicked the Truth movement right off the tracks.

Their own paper says that they can’t even be sure how it MAY have been used… they can’t even tell if it COULD have been used to blow up ANYTHING! Yet everyone runs around talking about this “highly thermetic material” as if it is the end all be all to the unofficial investigation.

Niels himself has gone on record saying based on the amounts of these chips they found in the dust, he estimates 10 tons of the shit was in the dust after the demolition.   10 tons? Unexploded “thermetic” material? What does that mean they actually USED to bring the towers down? 100 tons? A thousand? It’s completely ridiculous, like Jim Hoffman’s “Plausible” hypothesis for how the “thermetic material” was used in the demolition. Remember that? 100s of “illegal aliens” running around at break-neck speeds planting 1.8 MILLION individual CEILING TILE BOMBS and kicker charges disguised as FIRE EXTINGUISHERS?!?

More Bad Science Surrounding the “Nano-Thermite” Red Herring (archive)

(As Truther influencers start pushing the thermite distraction again (which even Professor Jones discredited) it's important to remember how it was used in the past to distract from very real convincing evidence from the RJ Lee Group ('it was a combustion event not a compression event'))

(archived from August 23, 2009)

by Scott Creighton

Another AE911Truth member has come out with what he claims is video evidence of the presence of  “nanothermite” in the demolition process of the World Trade Centers.  It is surprising that AE911Truth (an organization made up primarily of engineers and scientists)  would be promoting this video by David Chandler because it is an embarrassing collection of unsupported conclusions and really bad science.  It so obvious, anyone can pick it apart.  Unfortunately, I think that might be it’s purpose.

This “nanothermite” track that the Truth Movement has been on since the publication of the Harrit/Jones/Roberts paper has been increasingly dishonest since the very beginning and this is just another example of how “nanothermite” is blowing up our movement.

Which is, of course, the only thing this “super secret” pyrotechnic COULD blow up…

What they proposed in their paper was that they had found “active thermetic material” that utilized “nano technology” in the dust from the WTC demolitions.  In later discussions, they (Jones and Harrit at least) have estimated the presence of at least 10 tons of this unexploded material exists in the dust that was scattered around New York on Sept. 11th, 2001.

There has been a great deal of reasoned evaluation of the paper itself and the results of those evaluations have not been positive.

So Now Professor Jones Agrees with Me? (archive)

(With Ron Johnson saying in congress we need a new investigation into 9/11...all of a sudden these 'truthers' have popped up pushing 'nanothermite' as the means by which the controlled demolition took place. It's disinformation. Even Professor Jones of BYU, the guy who came up with the thermite/nanothermite/superthermite theory has admitted... thermite could NOT have demoed the buildings. It was conventional high explosives used in the controlled demolition industry. He admitted as much in 2009. and yet... here we are... seeing all these thought leaders in the Truth Movement push this same old debunked tired disinformation line... all over again.)

 

(archived from September 1, 2009)

by Scott Creighton

For months I have been taking hits from my colleagues in the Truth movement for my stand on the Jones, Harrit, Roberts paper “Active Thermetic Material…“.

I have stated, for the record and in no uncertain terms, that their “nano-thermetic material” could not have been w

hat pulverized the floor systems and was probably not what was used as cutter charges.

 

I have theorized a rational, logic based hypothesis for exactly what kind of explosive was used as the primary high-explosive in the demolition of the Trade Centers, and have even produced detailed drawings and schematics to illustrate my point.

Now guess who agrees with me?  Prof. Steven Jones does. Well, at least partly.

Steven Jones' Thermite Disinfo Still Demoing the Truth Movement

Once and for all the Twin Towers and Building 7 were not brought down with thermite. They were demoed using standard high explosives like RDX cutter charges and PETN det cord. And here I am after 20+ years having to explain it all once again. Oh well... such is life.

Strange Bedfellows: AE911Truth, the Drone Industry, and Dwain Deets

by Scott Creighton (archived repost from Sept. 11th, 2009)

Who is Dwain Deets?  And why is one of the founders of the drone aircraft industry writing papers with Gregg Roberts of AE911Truth and working on their staff?

In State of Play an employee of a mercenary contracting firm (read as Blackwater) turns into a whistle-blower and gives the investigative reporter played by Russel Crowe an idea of what kind of stakes are involved… “You have no idea what you are dealing with. That contract of theirs is worth billions.  That’s Wrath of God money.”

1. “Wrath of God Money”, indeed…

Scott and Izzy Discuss Operation Sindoor and ISI Involvement in 9/11

Yeah no I wont be backing the ISI's LeT terrorists on this one, thanks.

Stand with Pakistan's ISI-run LeT Terrorists My Ass!

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE: Looks like Mondoweiss stands with ISI terrorists. What a shame. 

Am I the Only One?

 We're supposed to applaud for al Qaeda who attacked us for our freedom... then they attack the government of Syria? Does anyone else find that even remotely hypocritical or am I the only one? 

Direct Support 

Biden Embraces al Qaeda Like Killary Before Him

by Scott Creighton

This is Mohammad al Jolani, the guy CNN lionized DAYS before they swept UNCONTESTED into Damascus. 

He is a WANTED TERRORIST who has killed civilians in Syria and elsewhere and also claims to have KILLED US SERVICEMEN IN IRAQ.

Biden took a moment to CHEER his efforts.

For the record, the group this guy belongs to supposedly did this a couple years ago. Just saying.

Biden claimed his is looking for a way to work with these guys.

Is that legal by the way? no

Please Do NOT Support AE49/11 Truth Anymore... They Simply Don't Deserve It

 by Scott Creighton

“However, our detractors could be counted on to do their best to use a negative result against us for P.R. purposes. They would say that we have a non-scientific belief, since a negative outcome from an experiment fails to shake it.    Thus, the potential costs of doing what you’re proposing and coming up empty-handed, or worse, must be considered.”  Gregg Roberts of AE9/11 truth

AE49/11 Truth is hosting some kind of 9/11 anniversary thing with the likes of Jimmy Dore, Jill Stein, Whitney Webb, Meryl Nass and Alex Stein of all people.

They wont have Richard Gage as a presenter because in 2021 they kicked him out of the organization he founded in 2007 due to Covid-19-related statements he made during an interview with Spike Lee for an HBO documentary he was making at the time.

SLATE magazine did a hit piece on Lee for having the audacity to even include 9/11 Truth advocates in such a main stream production. According to the author of the hit-piece, such debates are not allowed on settled subjects like 9/11 and the glorious mRNA 'vaccines'

'presents about a dozen conspiracy theorists and members of Gage’s group, including Gage himself, in a back-and-forth with three credible scientists who investigated the 9/11 attacks in a teach the controversy–style format that presents the truth behind 9/11 as an open debate between two equally valid sides' Slate

Spike Lee, thinking of the millions and millions he will make in the future with HBO, cut the segment out which featured such offensive thought-crimes.

Spike Lee also still claims Tawana Brawley was telling the truth. Yes, Spike Lee is a coward, an idiot AND a race-baiting liar.

The SLATE piece attacked anyone and everyone who ever DARED raise questions about steel and concrete buildings collapsing at free-fall acceleration into their own footprints due to office fires for the FIRST and LAST time in recorded history. Of course the writer didn't offer any evidence to back up their claims other than to claim everything has been debunked so shut up and don't ask questions.

Used to be the 9/11 Truth movement didn't turn tail and run from such right-think propaganda efforts. We used to take the time to expose them, line for line, for what they were: NWO propaganda.

But no. Not the new incarnation of AE49/11 Truth. They fired Richard Gage and tried to make the Truth movement think he retired of his own accord. 

AE49/11 Truth... LIED.

A Vetted 9/11 Truth Advocate Looks at the Reformed 'Conspiracist' Grifters

I wonder why this is suddenly a big thing in the news cycles today. Oh yeah. Something wicked this way comes.

9/11: The Conventional Explosives Hypothesis (a summary of Scott Creighton’s work)

(I don't know who wrote back in 2018, I'm sorry. I had no idea it was written. A very nice and thorough  analysis of my work on 9/11 demolition theory. Outstanding even. All the links are broken, however, I would guess you can find each article by using the link and the Way Back Machine. Thank you very much, whomever you are. Looks like the author stopped posting around July 2023. Hope you see this. Thanks again. Good work.)

from KapitalGate

Mr. Creighton’s hypothesis, authored over many articles, argues that the Towers were destroyed “via conventional demolition, and that during the design stages of the process, the conspirators relied too heavily on the use of detonation cord in the floor systems, which led to the vaporization of most of the truss systems. This was accidentally revealed (the “iron microspheres”) when the RJ Lee Group did their Composition and Morphology study of the Ground Zero dust samples for Deutsche Bank.”

PETN/RDX is a good candidate because these are the most commonly used hi-explosives in the industry. They have a long, studied history and are generally reliable. It’s sensible to start with the most plausible hypothesis (conventional hi-explosives) first, and failing that, move onto testing more exotic hypotheses.

Primaline 85 detonator cord would be used to pulverize the concrete, and also to remove the building’s lateral support supplied by the double-bridged long trusses. RDX cutter and kicker charges would be used to cut columns down to a specific length (every three floors is a common estimate from what I’ve read), and then ‘kick’ those columns out of the way from the proceeding downward collapse. Refer to article three, “Demolition Hypothesis”, for further details on the demolition sequence.

Background Reading if interested (Chronological Order):..

read more here

WHO, Cenk, 9/11, Rafah and That Fake IDF Reservist's Treason Video

Lot's to talk about today. Lets get to it.

Critical Thought Theory or the Objectivity of Truth

Why are people having such a hard time with reality? Because the Truth movement failed. It's time for a reboot. 

USA “Freedom” Act – Using Terrorism to Pass an “Anti-terrorism” Bill (archive)

(archived from May 31, 2015)

by Scott Creighton

Not like it’s the first time, is it?

Today is the day for the Grand Finale of the “Edward Snowden” psyop or the “Manufactured Hero” story as I also like to call it.

At midnight, the U.S.A. Patriot Act sunsets, or at least certain provisions of it do, and therefore the crisis theater threat color code has been turned all the way up to red. And it’s flashing (in spite of the fact that no terrorist threat was ever thwarted by the provisions of the Patriot Act)

Obama is demanding congress pass the “Freedom” Act. He says “God forbid” we don’t pass it and something happens after the Patriot Act goes dark.

Truth and Consequences: A Watershed Moment for Rebuilding a Movement (archive)

(archived from February 16, 2011)

by Scott Creighton

The website “9/11 Blogger” has been exposed as a controlled opposition site years ago by myself and other well-meaning Truth advocates.  Heavily controlled actually. 

Typically I wouldn’t waste my time or yours writing about the goings on over there but recently it has come to my attention that Blogger could  become a kind of microcosm for the Truth movement which allows us to better understand (1) the well-financed concerted effort which has been leveled against our little movement by those who mean to end speculation and reasoned inquiry about 9/11 once and for all and (2) the resilience of those of us who still demand to know the truth and still dare to speak it. 

What has happened has become a sort of watershed moment for the Truth movement. The contractors have tipped their hand and we have to decide what we are going to do about it. Are we going to reclaim what was stolen from us or are we going to fold?

In order to better illustrate the overall objective of the current campaign to demolish the Truth movement, I’m sorry, but I have to delve into a little of the obvious problems with the official story of 9/11. At least, these used to be considered obvious problems, before a certain element of the Truth movement started chipping away at them piece by piece.

NIST Says A Fire Caused It (Building 7 collapse); NIST Is Lying (archive)

(archived from August 21, 2008)

by Scott Creighton

It is high time we stopped putting up with bullshit.

Nearly 7 years after the fact, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (N.I.S.T.), a division of the Commerce Department, finally released their report on the collapse of Building 7.

We are told by N.I.S.T. that the cause of the buildings collapse was a standard “open” office fire caused a critical connection to fail due to what they call “heat expansion”, and that when that critical connection failed, it caused a domino effect with other connections, resulting in the perfectly symmetrical failure of the structure, starting with the center columns, resulting in the building falling and ending up in a perfectly neat pile, no bigger than it’s foundational foot-print. 

I don’t think so. Physics doesn't work that way. Allow me to explain.

A Truther on Albert Stubblebine Interview from 2013