Strange Bedfellows: AE911Truth, the Drone Industry, and Dwain Deets

by Scott Creighton (archived repost from Sept. 11th, 2009)

Who is Dwain Deets?  And why is one of the founders of the drone aircraft industry writing papers with Gregg Roberts of AE911Truth and working on their staff?

In State of Play an employee of a mercenary contracting firm (read as Blackwater) turns into a whistle-blower and gives the investigative reporter played by Russel Crowe an idea of what kind of stakes are involved… “You have no idea what you are dealing with. That contract of theirs is worth billions.  That’s Wrath of God money.”

1. “Wrath of God Money”, indeed…

US senator says new 9/11 investigation could happen

(Of course it could happen. But it wont.)

from RT

Republican US Senator Ron Johnson has suggested that new congressional hearings into the September 11 attacks may be forthcoming, citing unanswered questions surrounding the official narrative and the handling of evidence.

On September 11, 2001, al-Qaeda terrorists hijacked four passenger airliners, crashing two into the World Trade Center towers in Manhattan. A third plane struck the Pentagon, while the fourth crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), World Trade Center Building 7 collapsed due to fires ignited by debris from one of the nearby towers.

During an interview with conservative commentator Benny Johnson which was published on Monday, Senator Johnson questioned several aspects of the 9/11 investigation, including the collapse of Building 7.

“I don’t know that you can find structural engineers – other than the ones that have the corrupt investigation inside NIST – that would say that that thing didn’t come down in any other way than a controlled demolition,” he said.

Critical Thought Theory or the Objectivity of Truth

Why are people having such a hard time with reality? Because the Truth movement failed. It's time for a reboot. 

Haartz Publishes Cartoon Showing Netanyahu Flying Plane Labeled “ISRAEL” Into Twin Towers (archive)

(archived from October 31, 2014)

by Scott Creighton

Did Israel just post a warning to the United States about another possible 9/11 if relations aren’t immediately repaired between Tel Aviv and Washington?

I've been covering the recent downward spiral of the Israeli PR effort for the last couple of weeks but I have yet to see anything that comes even close to this in terms of asking “what the f*ck were they thinking?”

Sweden has just formally recognized Palestine as a state and the British lower house of parliament, the House of Commons, voted in a landslide to do the exact same thing. Combine that with the fact that Israel’s own president said publicly that Israel was a “sick society“, ranting Zionist racists at a protest and the tension between the White House and the “chickenshit” Likudniks over the illegal settlement program and what you end up with is a PR nightmare for Israel’s Hasbara program of international pro-Zionist “one state solution” propaganda.

So in the midst of all of this, what happens?

Sam Harris and Noam Chomsky’s “My Snake Oil is Better than Yours” Debate (archive)

(archived from May 3, 2015)

by Scott Creighton

The motivation behind writing this article should be understood as it is intended on two key points: (1) to serve as a correction of multiple fallacious arguments on the part of both Sam Harris and Noam Chomsky with regard to their recent email correspondence  “debate” recently published by Harris on his website and (2) and open invitation from myself to debate either or BOTH of them simultaneously in order to counter said fallacious arguments.

What is the value of a thesis if it is fundamentally flawed from the start and what is the value of a debate on that thesis given that rudimentary foundation is existentially crippled from the very beginning? The answer to both of those questions, in terms of what educated men like Sam Harris and Noam Chomsky must understand, both holding advanced degrees from prestigious institutions of higher learning, is ZERO.

The Soft Coup of East Palestine and Beyond

What does East Palestine and 9/11 have in common? The transition. Let me explain.

Grant Shapps video https://twitter.com/grantshapps/status/1626166264535080961

Trip and Fall  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoC7-0_715g

ER https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/16/health/er-doctors-khn-partner/index.html

derailment https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/15/us/toxic-chemicals-train-derailments-explainer/index.html

Partners https://www.weforum.org/partners/#A

Transformation https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/01/how-to-harness-transformative-potential-public-private-partnerships/

Observer https://city-countyobserver.com/public-private-partnerships-and-home-grown-soft-fascism/

Almost like an irregular warfare campaign huh?

1. race baiting
2. inflation
3. historic prime interest rate increase
   
4. layoffs
5. shortages
6. attacks on power grid
7. attacks on rail car infrastructure
8. mass shootings with no motives
9. sudden destruction of food distribution infrastructure
10. pandemic
11. air travel shut downs
12. balloons
    

sadf

Direct Support

Patreon https://www.patreon.com/americaneveryman
Cash App $scotty6199
Zelle rscdesigns@tampabay.rr.com (Chase bank)

FOLLOW/CONTACT:

Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/beautender

YouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/scottcreighton1

Substack: https://scottcreighton.substack.com/

website: https://nomadiceveryman.blogspot.com/
BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/americaneveryman/
Email: rscdesigns@tampabay.rr.com

Clowning on 'The Real' Jon Gold (cus it's just so damn easy)

So yesterday I made a video talking about how cognitive infiltration works now and how it has worked since 9/11 and how they attack anyone posting good information the establishment doesn't want you to know... and guess what happened? lol

9/11 Families Rant About New FBI Release - They Should Sue State Department Instead

 

The new release from the FBI proves nothing other than some of our assets in Saudi Arabia were handling TWO of the hijacker patsies. 

New 9/11 Memorial Timeline Lies About Building 7

Scott Creighton (archived from Feb. 2011)

A new 9/11 Memorial interactive timeline uses photos of Building 5 in place of real images of Building 7 in order to make the damage to the building look more severe. Ironically, Building 5, though it suffered tremendously more damage from falling debris and fires on that day, actually remained standing for 2 months after 9/11, while the building they choose not to show, the real Building 7, with far less damage, collapsed into its own footprint that day.

Now let’s remember what Shyam Sunder, head of the NIST investigation said about their findings on the complete destruction of Building 7 that day… 

“We really have a new kind of progressive collapse that we have discovered here, which is a fire induced progressive collapse. In fact, we have shown for the first time, that fire can induce a progressive collapse.”. Shyam Sunder.

The official story of 9/11 is that for the “first time” in history, normal office fires caused the complete global collapse of a steel and concrete hi-rise structure. With that in mind, let’s take a look at the new 9/11 Memorial photo, shall we?

Steven Jones Continues to Demo Truth Movement

Scott Creighton (archived from May 2011)

Back in 2003 the RJ Lee Group was contracted by Deutsche Bank to do a study to identify signature markers of the dust created by the destruction of the World Trade Centers on Sept. 11th 2001. 

Apparently the new owners of the Trade Centers or their insurance company didn’t want to pay for the cleaning of the dust and the damage to the Deutsche Bank building at 130 Liberty Street, New York. So Deutsche Bank paid the RJ Lee Group to prove that the dust and damage to their building did indeed come from the event at the World Trade Center that day. The report was titled WTC Dust Signature Report Composition and Morphology. Who was to know that the key evidence of the demolition of the Trade Centers would turn up in that report.

“Various metals (most notably iron and lead) were melted during the WTC Event, producing spherical metallic particles. Exposure of phases to high heat results in the formation of spherical particles due to surface tension. Figure 21 and Figure 22 show a spherical iron particle resulting from the melting of iron (or steel).”  2003 RJ Lee Group report page 17

“In addition to the spherical iron and aluminosilicate particles, a variety of heavy metal particles including lead, cadmium, vanadium, yttrium, arsenic, bismuth, and barium particles were produced by the pulverizing, melting and/or combustion of the host materials such as solder, computer screens, and paint during the WTC Event. Combustion-related products are significant WTC Dust Markers, particularly if seen in combination. However, it is worth noting that fly ash and partially combusted products can occur in trace concentrations in ordinary building dusts, but not in the concentrations observed in WTC Dust.”  2003 RJ Lee Group page 19

“The differences within the WTC Dust and typical background dusts include the fineness and evidence of heat, the size and concentration of the chrysotile, and the length and concentration of the mineral wool and other fibers, as well as the frequency of occurrence of spherical particles produced by fire and heat, char and soot, and other building products.”  2003 RJ Lee Group report page 19-20

What the RJ Lee Group found was that MANY types of heavy metals and plastics were melted instantly under great pressure during the event of 9/11 and that the evidence showed that this was due to a combustion event similar to an explosion. This kind of heat, this kind of pressure, could not have existed in the readily accepted Bazant “crush down crush up” theory. Key to the formation of these micro-spheres of molten metal is that they would have had to have been formed in space so that the surface tension would form them into spherical shapes. That means that they weren’t crushed or pulverized into these shapes, but rather massive amounts of heat and pressure were generated and the molten metal results were then formed via surface tension while they were then free floating in space.

This was then and still is now one of the strongest piece of scientific evidence which clearly disproves the official, gravity driven hypothesis of the events of 9/11.

The end result of that study should have been that it was taken up by dedicated researchers and scientists of the Truth movement and expanded upon and it would have been if BYU, an ultra-conservative university in Utah which gave Dick Cheney an honorary doctorate of Public Service degree in 2007, hadn’t paid Dr. Steven Jones to mislead the Truth movement for years about those findings. Ironically (or maybe not so much so) it was right around the same time that BYU also honored Dr. Jones by raising his status at BYU to that of Professor Emeritus.

Dust to Dust:Testing for Residue of Conventional High Explosives in Ground Zero Dust is a Possibility

Scott Creighton (archived from June 2012)

UPDATE: Well, no replies as of yet. Perhaps dis-info campaigns such as “micro nukes”, “ray-beams from space”, and “nano-thermite” have won the day after all.

 (the following quote was added to my article when they posted it on Intel Hub in June of 2012. They added this bit of disinfo to go along with my serious research kinda like Youtube adds shit to your videos if they don't like it's content)

“Editors Note: It is important to point that micro nukes were most likely used at the base core of the WTC buildings in conjunction with nano-thermite and C-4.” The Intel Hub June 25th 2012

(now back to original article)

Over the years I have been one of the most outspoken proponents of running standard tests on the dust collected from Ground Zero to see if in fact there are residual traces of conventional high explosive residues present in it. This type of test has been called for by many of the so-called 9/11 Truth “researchers” but they never seem to find the time to do it and then, in the end, when I pressed a few of them on the subject, they flatly refused for “PR” blowback reasons. Or so they told me. 

“However, our detractors could be counted on to do their best to use a negative result against us for P.R. purposes. They would say that we have a non-scientific belief, since a negative outcome from an experiment fails to shake it.    Thus, the potential costs of doing what you’re proposing and coming up empty-handed, or worse, must be considered.”  Gregg Roberts of AE9/11 truth

I even went so far over a year ago to carefully construct and publish what I thought was the best process by which to run the tests themselves.

Proposed Testing Procedure for High Explosive Residues in Ground Zero Dust

After years of research, it is my hypothesis, which I still stand behind to this day, that the Twin Towers were taken out via an explosive controlled demolition and that during the design stages of the process, they relied too heavily on the use of det cord in the floor systems (see image below) which led to the vaporization of most of the truss systems which was accidentally revealed (the metal micro-spheres) when the RJ Lee Group did their Composition and Morphology study of the Ground Zero dust samples for Deutsche Bank .

The RJ Lee study also found that temperatures had been reached “at which lead would have undergone vaporization”– meaning 1,749°C (3,180°F).

Another study was carried out by the US Geological Survey, the purpose of which was to aid the “identification of WTC dust components.” Besides also finding iron particles, the scientists involved in this study found that molybdenum had been melted. This finding was especially significant, because this metal does not melt until it reaches 2,623°C (4,753°F). Griffin

Why do I bring all of this up now?

Good question.

The 6,000

Scott Creighton (archived from Aug. 2009)

***UPDATE*** At the end of this article, I have added a plan view layout and cross-section of what I hypothesize as the potential det cord layout plan for a typical WTC floor.  Scott has asked how the cord may have been used, so I thought I would include the drawings.

————–

In yesterdays article titled “The 23,000 Missing Trusses of 9/11“, I questioned why it is that I can’t seem to find one single truss (of the 23,300+ of them from the Twin Towers) in all the photos of the debris and the clean-up process at Ground Zero.  I went further and hypothesized that the missing trusses may in fact be the mysterious “tons of iron-rich (read as “steel”) spheres” that Jones and others have found.  It would seem a logical assumption.

As odd as their absence from the debris field is, when you understand how these truss sections were fabricated and installed, it makes the story of the missing trusses an even greater mystery.  And perhaps an even bigger clue. 

The 46,000 Missing Trusses of 9/11

Scott Creighton (archived from Aug. 2009)

 Sometimes what isn’t visible at a crime scene is just as important as what is.

***UPDATE*** note the updated truss count. My original estimate of 23,000 trusses was based on the idea that they used single trusses in between the section breaks when in fact they did not, they used double trusses everywhere on each floor. My first count was based on doing a layout of the truss structure and then simply counting and multiplying that number by the number of floors which used these trusses. Turns out, the number of missing trusses is actually double my original number… about 43,000 – 46,000. With that one exception, I believe the research in this article still stands.

***UPDATE*** Please check out the companion article, The6,000.

--

According to the official explanation of the collapse of the Twin Towers on Sept. 11th, 2001… the initial plane crashes damaged the core structure of the towers enough so that when the resulting fires “weakened” the floor trusses, the result was that the remaining floors above the areas of the plane crash and fires crashed down on the undamaged parts of the buildings, and “pulverized” them in a gravity driven demolition of sorts.

This “official” explanation, which if left unchallenged, stands as the basis for the endless “War on Terror”, the war in Iraq, the war in Afghanistan, the attacks on the general population of Pakistan, the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act, warrant-less and illegal surveillance of U.S. citizens, and various other assaults on our democratic freedoms… is basically a lie.

It is impossible.

Sometimes in an investigation, what you don’t find at the crime scene is just as important as what you do find.  Provided you know what to look for and you understand why it is or isn’t there.

With that in mind, I offer for your consideration, the great mystery of the missing Trusses and Floor-Pans of the World Trade Center towers 1 and 2… and the (estimated) 10 tons of “iron-rich” spheres found in the dust at Ground Zero by every single investigative agency that has bothered to look.

Archiving My 9/11 Research as Promised

Spending the morning archiving much of my work on the subject of 9/11. Will post more after I return from the doctor's office.

“Demolition Teams” on site at Ground Zero hours before WTC 7 Fell

by Scott Creighton (archived from Feb. 2009)

While attempting to find out who the “special engineer” was that accurately predicted the collapse of Building 7 five hours before it fell, I ran across an article written by Brett Blanchard, Director of Field Operations for Protec Documentation Services. In that article, he lets it slip that “several” demolition teams were on site at Ground Zero before building 7 came down.

The article itself is here:

http://www.jod911.com/WTC%20COLLAPSE%20STUDY%20BBlanchard%208-8-06.pdf

… and the site for Protec is here:

http://www.protecservices.com/index.htm

Once again, the article is of the typical “whitewash the controlled demolition theory” garden variety. Not hard at all to run through line by line and debunk. Blanchard’s piece is full of unsupported misinformation like “The fact is many steel structures have collapsed due to fire.” which, of course stands in direct contrast to NIST’s report as well as even the latest BBC hit piece which agrees with the conclusion that Building 7 and the Towers were the first steel framed buildings in history to collapse due to fire.

But then, on page 9, Blanchard offers this little tidbit of information;

“5. Several demolition teams had reached Ground Zero by 3:00pm on 9/11, and these individuals witnessed the collapse of WTC 7 within a few hundred feet of the event.”

Demolition teams were on site prior to Building 7’s “collapse”…

9/11 and the Just War

by Scott Creighton (archived from Sept. 2008)

 One hour after the first plane struck the North Tower on Sept. 11th 2001, the media began to “teach” us that Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda were responsible for the attacks.

They have, for the most part, never questioned that conclusion despite mounds of evidence to the contrary. We are told we must accept their story as truth, we must teach their story to our children as gospel, and we must revere the very mention of their story, ”The Global War on Terror”, as we do our flag, our anthem, and our troops.

How an Average Guy Became “A Truther”

Scott Creighton (archived from Aug. 2008)

There is nothing special about me.

After college, I went into construction, and worked hands on for over 15 years. I hung steel on the NB Handy Building in Lynchburg Va. I attended Mountain Productions Rigging School, I was Head Rigger for Showman Fabricators in New York City and installed the new (at that time) MSNBC Studios. I also weld a little (MIG only). Since then, I have exclusively worked in architectural design, Computer aided drafting (CAD). (JPEGS of my work available upon request) i do engineering specifications for commercial and residential new construction (I am not an engineer). A recent project put me in Atlanta (last month) for the installation of a project I designed the technical specifications for - commercial project involving massive steel structures, design weight bearing loads, and even THERMAL EXPANSION RATIOS.

That is my background.

Now, I will tell you this; those buildings, all of them, were brought down by Controlled Demolition. Of that, there is no question.

The Gift of 9/11

by Scott Creighton (archived from Sept 2008)

The events of 9/11 unfolded before us in a grand spectacle of shock, emotion, and repetitive images; collapsing burning, jumping, screaming, falling, crying, dying. And we watched, helpless as a baby lost in a world of wolves, as black clouds, 10 stories tall, glided down the streets consuming everything we had once known and cherished about ourselves. We watched people trying desperately to escape the gathering gloom. They ran, and then we ran. We ran right into the waiting arms of Big Brother. Right where we were supposed to run. Where we would be …safe.

But we aren’t safe, are we? Far, far from it.

Unbelievable: NIST Uses CDI (suspect?) To Prove No Controled Demolition

by Scott Creighton (archived from Aug. 2008)

Yesterday, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a division of the Department of Commerce, finally released it’s report on the cause of the mysterious collapse of Building 7 of the World Trade Center (WTC) complex. There have already been several to jump out in front and claim that this puts an end to the “conspiracy theories” that have surrounded Building 7’s inexplicable destruction, since it happened on Sept. 11th 2001.

“We really have a new kind of progressive collapse that we have discovered here, which is a fire induced progressive collapse. In fact, we have shown for the first time, that fire can induce a progressive collapse.”. Shyam Sunder. (first time in history and flies in the face of what we know about engineering and the laws of physics. But, they NEVER tested for explosive residue and yet, this is the “first time” this “new” phenomenon occurred? Right.)

Steven Jones and Richard Gage have already come forward and denounced NIST’s finding as implausible.

NIST Says A Fire Caused It; NIST Is Lying

by Scott Creighton (archive from Aug. 2008)

It is high time we stopped putting up with bullshit.

Nearly 7 years after the fact, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (N.I.S.T.), a division of the Commerce Department, finally released their report on the collapse of Building 7 today.

(pay careful attention to the sound on this. There are very few videos of the collapse of Building 7 with sound.)

We are told by N.I.S.T. that the cause of the buildings collapse was a standard “open” office fire caused a critical connection to fail due to what they call “heat expansion”, and that when that critical connection failed, it caused a domino effect with other connections, resulting in the perfectly symmetrical failure of the structure, starting with the center columns, resulting in the building falling and ending up in a perfectly neat pile, no bigger than it’s foundational foot-print. I don’t think so.