Anwar al Awlaki: Public Enemy #1 or Something Else?

(archived on September 30, 2011)

by Scott Creighton

“No person … shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law” Fifth Amendment, US Constitution

It is being reported that the United States launched a drone strike in Yemen that killed targeted US citizen Anwar Awlaki as well as former North Carolina resident Samir Khan. Now, if he’s actually dead.. this time… what exactly does it mean? Who did Obama kill without due process of law and more importantly… why?

While President Obama (Peace Prize “winner” (Nobel committee admitted they gave him the award because they wanted to “support his agenda” and not for anything that he had done “”It was because we would like to support what he is trying to achieve“”)) is busy patting himself on the back for what he calls a “major blow” against al Qaeda, keep in mind that the entire al Awlaki story is fraught with bullshit and exaggeration from the very beginning. Now he supposedly gets killed while riding along with a completely fraudulent al CIAda psyop by the name of Samir Khan?

The States Secrets of a Policital Question: The Anwar Al-Aulaqi Story

(archived from September 25, 2010)

by Scott Creighton

Why is President Obama trying use the ‘states secrets” excuse to thwart a preliminary injunction brought by Anwar Al-Aulaqi’s father? Because if he doesn’t he could be impeached and the truth about this story, were it to come out in court and then go mainstream, would expose the Global War on Terror as a complete fraud. That’s why.

The evidence is there and the history of the story is undeniable; President Obama killed 41 innocent civilians including 14 women and 21 children with a BGM-109D Tomahawk missile strike on Dec. 17th 2009. That is a fact.

Then, to retroactively justify what the president of CHANGE did, the state department allowed a ”terrorist” onto a plane on Christmas day after his father had warned them several times about his motives. That is also a fact.

It was at that point that a contract was put out on the life of a U.S. citizen to retroactively justify the Dec. 17th 2009 attack which killed civilians, mainly children, in a country we are not at war with.

Though that bullshit official story will hold up under the “scrutiny” of a complicit media, it would shatter under cross-examination in a court of law and the Obama administration damn well knows it.

The only “political question” here is the survival of our Peace Laureate president.