Was it some friend of a gay prostitute having a little fun with Glenn on Twitter? Or was it something else? Was it Israel? Glenn still talks about Israel. Was it Palantir? What did Glenn say about J.D. Vance 10 days before this happened? Is there a lesson to be gleaned from this story either way? Maybe he shouldn't have helped privatize the surveillance state.
(In April of 2004 the Abu Ghraib leaked photos went public. In Oct of 2006 the CIA's WhyKeyLeaks honeypot operation was launched to trick future whistleblowers into giving them their files so they could be trashed and the whistleblowers disappeared. In Nov of 2012 nearly 800 major US corporations contributed tons of cash to US politicians to get them to pass CISPA, legislation which would allow for the privatization of the surveillance state. In May of 2013 'Snowden' psyop pushed for that very same legislation, then called CISA. For the record, CIA killed RFK Jr.'s father and uncle. Now he serves them. Just sayin)
from RT
The US authorities should stop prosecuting WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, and instead erect a monument in Washington DC to celebrate his “heroic” deeds, independent US presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has said. He insisted that the case against Assange runs counter to the freedom of the press.
The US indicted the WikiLeaks founder under the Espionage Act for assisting whistleblower Chelsea Manning in a 2010 disclosure of hundreds of thousands of classified documents related to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Assange is now battling US attempts to extradite him from Britain...
According to the independent presidential candidate, “Assange should be celebrated as a hero for doing exactly what journalists are supposed to do, which is to expose government corruption.”...
Kennedy went on to say that the “same is true for Edward Snowden, who exposed illegal spying by the NSA,” calling the US whistleblower a “hero, not a criminal.”...
The Censorship Industrial Complex targeting American civilians holding 'disfavored views' so deemed by Big Business and the fascist government that serves them.
by Scott Creighton
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) (formerly known as Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA)) was finally approved in the United States in the wake of the Edward Snowden psychological operation which followed the murder of Aaron Swartz and an army of 800 lobbyists invading D.C. to DEMAND they pass their law which essentially privatized the surveillance state here in America.
'In all, with the aligned companies that make up the various Roundtables and alliances, there are 800 corporations that support the passage of CISPA.
800 corporations, Business Roundtable, Financial Roundtable, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, the Military Industrial Complex in general all standing for something the general public is strongly against...
...This is basically the wet dream of the fascist state which is why 800 corporations support it and spent $68 million dollars last year lobbying congress to push it through this year.' Scott Creighton
They cleverly found a way to get the general public to cry out for a remaking of the system by which intelligence information is gathered and processed here in the US by simply getting a nerdy-looking front-man and supposedly trust worthy alt-journalists to push it with some bullshit Power Point 'leaks' that had been known already for years.
by Scott Creighton
By Deception, thou shall make fascism. One Party mandate
One manufactured crisis psyop after another. That’s how our government works these days.
President Obama signed into law the U.S.A. Freedom Act on June the 2nd. On June the 1st and most of Tuesday, June 2nd, certain provisions of the Patriot Act had been allowed to sunset, to expire. Those were controversial sections of the law which provided legal cover for things like collecting mass amounts of personal data from everyone, the “lone wolf” provision and roving wiretaps.
by Scott Creighton
On a pleasant Sunday afternoon, sitting comfortably in his home in Rio de Janeiro with a nifty little green-screen at his back (what self respecting journalist doesn’t have one of those), Glenn Greenwald admitting he was well aware of his star witness’ potentially fatal character flaws prior to publishing his overly hyped article on NSA “secrets” that the world already knew about. Glenn then deliberately misrepresented the nature and scope of the NSA’s spying program and perhaps inadvertently offered up a glimpse of the real motivation behind the Snowden Psyop for anyone who cared to listen.
Over the past week and a half that I have been covering this story, my position has been that Glenn was probably just fed a bit of information on some new “Deepthroat” type whistle-blower and the promise of a Big Story … something on the lines of his work back in 2006 on the first (and the real) spying scandal leak when he went from being an obscure blogger to the toast of the town in the alternative media. I figured he was probably a dupe who had been set-up by his own paper, the Guardian, in order to lend this Snowden psyop some more credibility and in the end, to destroy a journalist viewed as the “professional left”. I concluded that Greenwald was not an active participant in the overall psyop strategy.
I cannot in good faith support that conclusion any longer.
The FSB has exposed US intelligence agencies working with Apple to spy on various people in and around Russia in order to keep track of developments. At the same time, a perfectly obvious Honey Pot trap has been set up to snare whistle blowers and dissidents over at something called Forbidden Stories. Aunt BB is covering this. Thought I would add my two cents.
by Scott Creighton
What exactly was Aaron Swartz’ crime against humanity? Was it really that he “liberated” some academic papers from MIT in order to make them available without cost on the internet? Is that why the prosecution hit him with 14 felony charges facing 35 years in prison or was it something else?
Aaron Swartz was found hanged in his Brooklyn apartment a year ago today. Many, including those who profess to honor his memory and his activism, parrot the official talking points about Mr. Swartz saying he took his own life rather than face the possibility of going to prison.
That story is bullshit and anyone repeating it, ANYONE, is NOT to be believed in any fashion. Lest we forget:
“During plea talks held in the months before his death, federal prosecutors told Aaron Swartz and his attorney that the computer prodigy must spend six months behind bars and plead guilty to 13 federal crimes in order to resolve the criminal case short of a trial.” Boston.com article from 1/14/13
“The best deal the prosecutors would offer was four months in prison with Swartz pleading guilty to 13 felonies. And they warned Peters that his client had better take it while he still could.
“They told me over and over again that the offer had been on the table,” Peters says. “And any future offer would be less attractive.” Daily Beast 1/15/13
Granted, that is the defense attorney’s statements on the matter of the deal offered to Aaron Swartz prior to his “suicide”. Here is what the prosecutor herself said: