The True Left Admits Trump/Putin Summit was NOT a Failure

Our leaders are supposed to meet with adversaries in order to work toward PEACE rather than just continue to appease the MIC with endless, mindless war. Trump's meeting with Putin may be a good start to that end but the fake alt-left is too busy hating him to remember what the left is supposed to stand for.

summit updates plus Ukraine neo-Nazi pics  https://nomadiceveryman.blogspot.com/2025/08/trmp-putin-summit-live-updates.html

Pentagon images  https://nomadiceveryman.blogspot.com/2025/08/moments-after-plane-hit-pentagon-before.html

Direct Support 

Moments After 'Plane' Hit Pentagon Before Collapse of Wall

by Scott Creighton

Hunt the Boeing. Where is it? Do you see anything to suggest a massive 757-200 hit the Pentagon on September 11 2001? Tail section would have crumpled and broken off and been outside the building. That wall was steel reinforced concrete and stone. Where are the wings? Luggage? Anything?

 

There is nothing to suggest a commercial airliner hit the Pentagon right in the section where Donald Rumsfeld says they were looking for the missing 2.3 trillion dollars just the day before 9/11. What a coincidence.

Serious Problems With Jim Hoffman’s “A Hypothetical Blasting Scenario ” Makes His Recent Essay Far From “Plausible” (archive)

(I post this as a reminder of just how convoluted the 'thermite' distraction was from the very beginning.)

(Ceiling tile bombs. Yeah. Ceiling tile bombs.)

(archived from April 4, 2009)

by Scott Creighton

Jim Hoffman has just published his essay ” A Hypothetical Blasting Scenario:  A Plausible Theory Explaining the Controlled Demolition of the Twin Towers Using Aluminothermic Incendiaries and Explosives with Wireless Ignition Means” in time for it to coincide with the new Jones et al piece, “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe” and quite frankly, Hoffmans work is structurally unsound.

I don’t want to get too far into a critical review of Hoffmans work till I can wrap my head around what Jones’ paper concludes and that is mainly because Hoffman’s efforts are largely based on giving what he thinks is a practical application for the hypothesis of aluminothermic controlled demolition of the Trade Centers.  Clearly understanding more about the new Steven Jones work is key to validating Hoffman’s theory.

I am currently working through the Jones effort as you will see in a moment.

But Hoffman’s “Plausible” theory is a horse of a different color. It would appear that he may have been too eager to get a working demolition theory out there at the same time Jones released his research.

His “Plausible” theory and his conclusions need a lot more work.

Niels Harrit is a Weasel. He’s the Back-Stabbing Fredo of the Truth Family (archive)

(archived from August 2, 2009)

by Scott Creighton

***UPDATE*** anyone want to join in on the conversation? We are having an interesting chat on the comments section… jump right in folks…

Just look at him.  He’s a weasel.

Disinfo specialist, red-chip peddling, snake oil salesman.  What he and Jones have done to the “Truth” movement is criminal. Their ridiculous claim about the “thermetic” material (that’s not even a WORD people) kicked the Truth movement right off the tracks.

Their own paper says that they can’t even be sure how it MAY have been used… they can’t even tell if it COULD have been used to blow up ANYTHING! Yet everyone runs around talking about this “highly thermetic material” as if it is the end all be all to the unofficial investigation.

Niels himself has gone on record saying based on the amounts of these chips they found in the dust, he estimates 10 tons of the shit was in the dust after the demolition.   10 tons? Unexploded “thermetic” material? What does that mean they actually USED to bring the towers down? 100 tons? A thousand? It’s completely ridiculous, like Jim Hoffman’s “Plausible” hypothesis for how the “thermetic material” was used in the demolition. Remember that? 100s of “illegal aliens” running around at break-neck speeds planting 1.8 MILLION individual CEILING TILE BOMBS and kicker charges disguised as FIRE EXTINGUISHERS?!?

More Bad Science Surrounding the “Nano-Thermite” Red Herring (archive)

(As Truther influencers start pushing the thermite distraction again (which even Professor Jones discredited) it's important to remember how it was used in the past to distract from very real convincing evidence from the RJ Lee Group ('it was a combustion event not a compression event'))

(archived from August 23, 2009)

by Scott Creighton

Another AE911Truth member has come out with what he claims is video evidence of the presence of  “nanothermite” in the demolition process of the World Trade Centers.  It is surprising that AE911Truth (an organization made up primarily of engineers and scientists)  would be promoting this video by David Chandler because it is an embarrassing collection of unsupported conclusions and really bad science.  It so obvious, anyone can pick it apart.  Unfortunately, I think that might be it’s purpose.

This “nanothermite” track that the Truth Movement has been on since the publication of the Harrit/Jones/Roberts paper has been increasingly dishonest since the very beginning and this is just another example of how “nanothermite” is blowing up our movement.

Which is, of course, the only thing this “super secret” pyrotechnic COULD blow up…

What they proposed in their paper was that they had found “active thermetic material” that utilized “nano technology” in the dust from the WTC demolitions.  In later discussions, they (Jones and Harrit at least) have estimated the presence of at least 10 tons of this unexploded material exists in the dust that was scattered around New York on Sept. 11th, 2001.

There has been a great deal of reasoned evaluation of the paper itself and the results of those evaluations have not been positive.

So Now Professor Jones Agrees with Me? (archive)

(With Ron Johnson saying in congress we need a new investigation into 9/11...all of a sudden these 'truthers' have popped up pushing 'nanothermite' as the means by which the controlled demolition took place. It's disinformation. Even Professor Jones of BYU, the guy who came up with the thermite/nanothermite/superthermite theory has admitted... thermite could NOT have demoed the buildings. It was conventional high explosives used in the controlled demolition industry. He admitted as much in 2009. and yet... here we are... seeing all these thought leaders in the Truth Movement push this same old debunked tired disinformation line... all over again.)

 

(archived from September 1, 2009)

by Scott Creighton

For months I have been taking hits from my colleagues in the Truth movement for my stand on the Jones, Harrit, Roberts paper “Active Thermetic Material…“.

I have stated, for the record and in no uncertain terms, that their “nano-thermetic material” could not have been w

hat pulverized the floor systems and was probably not what was used as cutter charges.

 

I have theorized a rational, logic based hypothesis for exactly what kind of explosive was used as the primary high-explosive in the demolition of the Trade Centers, and have even produced detailed drawings and schematics to illustrate my point.

Now guess who agrees with me?  Prof. Steven Jones does. Well, at least partly.

Steven Jones' Thermite Disinfo Still Demoing the Truth Movement

Once and for all the Twin Towers and Building 7 were not brought down with thermite. They were demoed using standard high explosives like RDX cutter charges and PETN det cord. And here I am after 20+ years having to explain it all once again. Oh well... such is life.

Strange Bedfellows: AE911Truth, the Drone Industry, and Dwain Deets

by Scott Creighton (archived repost from Sept. 11th, 2009)

Who is Dwain Deets?  And why is one of the founders of the drone aircraft industry writing papers with Gregg Roberts of AE911Truth and working on their staff?

In State of Play an employee of a mercenary contracting firm (read as Blackwater) turns into a whistle-blower and gives the investigative reporter played by Russel Crowe an idea of what kind of stakes are involved… “You have no idea what you are dealing with. That contract of theirs is worth billions.  That’s Wrath of God money.”

1. “Wrath of God Money”, indeed…

US senator says new 9/11 investigation could happen

(Of course it could happen. But it wont.)

from RT

Republican US Senator Ron Johnson has suggested that new congressional hearings into the September 11 attacks may be forthcoming, citing unanswered questions surrounding the official narrative and the handling of evidence.

On September 11, 2001, al-Qaeda terrorists hijacked four passenger airliners, crashing two into the World Trade Center towers in Manhattan. A third plane struck the Pentagon, while the fourth crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), World Trade Center Building 7 collapsed due to fires ignited by debris from one of the nearby towers.

During an interview with conservative commentator Benny Johnson which was published on Monday, Senator Johnson questioned several aspects of the 9/11 investigation, including the collapse of Building 7.

“I don’t know that you can find structural engineers – other than the ones that have the corrupt investigation inside NIST – that would say that that thing didn’t come down in any other way than a controlled demolition,” he said.

Please Do NOT Support AE49/11 Truth Anymore... They Simply Don't Deserve It (video)

You want to help a real Truth advocate? Help Richard Gage.

Richard Gage https://richardgage911.org/ 

Please Do NOT Support AE49/11 Truth Anymore... They Simply Don't Deserve It

 by Scott Creighton

“However, our detractors could be counted on to do their best to use a negative result against us for P.R. purposes. They would say that we have a non-scientific belief, since a negative outcome from an experiment fails to shake it.    Thus, the potential costs of doing what you’re proposing and coming up empty-handed, or worse, must be considered.”  Gregg Roberts of AE9/11 truth

AE49/11 Truth is hosting some kind of 9/11 anniversary thing with the likes of Jimmy Dore, Jill Stein, Whitney Webb, Meryl Nass and Alex Stein of all people.

They wont have Richard Gage as a presenter because in 2021 they kicked him out of the organization he founded in 2007 due to Covid-19-related statements he made during an interview with Spike Lee for an HBO documentary he was making at the time.

SLATE magazine did a hit piece on Lee for having the audacity to even include 9/11 Truth advocates in such a main stream production. According to the author of the hit-piece, such debates are not allowed on settled subjects like 9/11 and the glorious mRNA 'vaccines'

'presents about a dozen conspiracy theorists and members of Gage’s group, including Gage himself, in a back-and-forth with three credible scientists who investigated the 9/11 attacks in a teach the controversy–style format that presents the truth behind 9/11 as an open debate between two equally valid sides' Slate

Spike Lee, thinking of the millions and millions he will make in the future with HBO, cut the segment out which featured such offensive thought-crimes.

Spike Lee also still claims Tawana Brawley was telling the truth. Yes, Spike Lee is a coward, an idiot AND a race-baiting liar.

The SLATE piece attacked anyone and everyone who ever DARED raise questions about steel and concrete buildings collapsing at free-fall acceleration into their own footprints due to office fires for the FIRST and LAST time in recorded history. Of course the writer didn't offer any evidence to back up their claims other than to claim everything has been debunked so shut up and don't ask questions.

Used to be the 9/11 Truth movement didn't turn tail and run from such right-think propaganda efforts. We used to take the time to expose them, line for line, for what they were: NWO propaganda.

But no. Not the new incarnation of AE49/11 Truth. They fired Richard Gage and tried to make the Truth movement think he retired of his own accord. 

AE49/11 Truth... LIED.

9/11: The Conventional Explosives Hypothesis (a summary of Scott Creighton’s work)

(I don't know who wrote back in 2018, I'm sorry. I had no idea it was written. A very nice and thorough  analysis of my work on 9/11 demolition theory. Outstanding even. All the links are broken, however, I would guess you can find each article by using the link and the Way Back Machine. Thank you very much, whomever you are. Looks like the author stopped posting around July 2023. Hope you see this. Thanks again. Good work.)

from KapitalGate

Mr. Creighton’s hypothesis, authored over many articles, argues that the Towers were destroyed “via conventional demolition, and that during the design stages of the process, the conspirators relied too heavily on the use of detonation cord in the floor systems, which led to the vaporization of most of the truss systems. This was accidentally revealed (the “iron microspheres”) when the RJ Lee Group did their Composition and Morphology study of the Ground Zero dust samples for Deutsche Bank.”

PETN/RDX is a good candidate because these are the most commonly used hi-explosives in the industry. They have a long, studied history and are generally reliable. It’s sensible to start with the most plausible hypothesis (conventional hi-explosives) first, and failing that, move onto testing more exotic hypotheses.

Primaline 85 detonator cord would be used to pulverize the concrete, and also to remove the building’s lateral support supplied by the double-bridged long trusses. RDX cutter and kicker charges would be used to cut columns down to a specific length (every three floors is a common estimate from what I’ve read), and then ‘kick’ those columns out of the way from the proceeding downward collapse. Refer to article three, “Demolition Hypothesis”, for further details on the demolition sequence.

Background Reading if interested (Chronological Order):..

read more here

Critical Thought Theory or the Objectivity of Truth

Why are people having such a hard time with reality? Because the Truth movement failed. It's time for a reboot. 

Truth and Consequences: A Watershed Moment for Rebuilding a Movement (archive)

(archived from February 16, 2011)

by Scott Creighton

The website “9/11 Blogger” has been exposed as a controlled opposition site years ago by myself and other well-meaning Truth advocates.  Heavily controlled actually. 

Typically I wouldn’t waste my time or yours writing about the goings on over there but recently it has come to my attention that Blogger could  become a kind of microcosm for the Truth movement which allows us to better understand (1) the well-financed concerted effort which has been leveled against our little movement by those who mean to end speculation and reasoned inquiry about 9/11 once and for all and (2) the resilience of those of us who still demand to know the truth and still dare to speak it. 

What has happened has become a sort of watershed moment for the Truth movement. The contractors have tipped their hand and we have to decide what we are going to do about it. Are we going to reclaim what was stolen from us or are we going to fold?

In order to better illustrate the overall objective of the current campaign to demolish the Truth movement, I’m sorry, but I have to delve into a little of the obvious problems with the official story of 9/11. At least, these used to be considered obvious problems, before a certain element of the Truth movement started chipping away at them piece by piece.

NIST Says A Fire Caused It (Building 7 collapse); NIST Is Lying (archive)

(archived from August 21, 2008)

by Scott Creighton

It is high time we stopped putting up with bullshit.

Nearly 7 years after the fact, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (N.I.S.T.), a division of the Commerce Department, finally released their report on the collapse of Building 7.

We are told by N.I.S.T. that the cause of the buildings collapse was a standard “open” office fire caused a critical connection to fail due to what they call “heat expansion”, and that when that critical connection failed, it caused a domino effect with other connections, resulting in the perfectly symmetrical failure of the structure, starting with the center columns, resulting in the building falling and ending up in a perfectly neat pile, no bigger than it’s foundational foot-print. 

I don’t think so. Physics doesn't work that way. Allow me to explain.

Iran Did 9/11?: Part 1 – The Excellent Foppery of the World (archive)

(archived from December 17, 2011)

by Scott Creighton

Families of a very small percentage of the victims of 9/11 seek to steal 2 billion dollars from the people of Iran based on Donald Rumsfeld quotes, the absence of an Iranian stamp on passports given to the hijackers by the US State Department, and the hearsay testimony of an already discredited MEK terrorist.

“This is the excellent foppery of the world, that,
when we are sick in fortune,–often the surfeit
of our own behavior,–we make guilty of our
disasters the sun, the moon, and the stars: as
if we were villains by necessity; fools by
heavenly compulsion; knaves, thieves, and
treachers, by spherical predominance; drunkards,
liars, and adulterers, by an enforced obedience of
planetary influence; and all that we are evil in,
by a divine thrusting on: an admirable evasion
of whoremaster man, to lay his goatish
disposition to the charge of a star” William Shakespeare, King Lear, Edmund the Bastard, 1.2.132

Edmund the bastard lays bare the excellent foppery of the world, that as we suffer from the our own misdeeds, we find ways to lay the blame elsewhere as if by some divine plan our fate was not of our own design. The Sun (al Qaeda), the Moon (Iraq), and the Stars (Iran) have now all been blamed for what was our own invention, all that we are evil in. Thus is the nature of whore-master man.

Pepsi Image is Definitely of 9/11 (archive)

(archived from December 20, 2011)

by Scott Creighton

A can found in a chow-line in Iraq is stirring up a lot of controversy here back home. The can of Pepsi seems to have an image on it that depicts the World Trade Centers on the day of the attack of 9/11. There are a lot of people running from website to website trying to claim it’s not 9/11 and that instead it’s one of 7 special cans Pepsi Dubai created for the anniversary of their 40 years of being in the United Arab Emirates. In fact, over at Above Top Secret someone named Brian put together their first ever “news recap” video in which they seem to be reading directly from a Pepsi PR statement about the can and they make that very claim. That’s bunk. I have posted Pepsi’s own promotional photo of those 7 cans and the “9/11 can” is nothing like them.

Below I have shown you with simple outlines, the image of the “9/11 can” next to iconic images of the World Trade Center and the 9/11 attacks. There is no question that the image on the can is indeed meant to remind you of the WTC and 9/11

9/11, Afghanistan, Iraq, Georgia, Iran, and Pakistan; The Vulcan’s Path to The Caspian Sea Basin (archive)

(archived from August 10, 2008)

by Scott Creighton

***UPDATE*** Reddit blocked this one as well.

One of the first things this administration did was meet with Dick Cheney’s Energy Task Force in early 2001. Those meetings were kept secret and they have refused to disclose who was actually there, and what was discussed. We all know that.

“The Washington Post reported on November 15, 2005 that it had obtained documents detailing how executives from major oil corporations, including Exxon-Mobil Corp., Conoco, Royal Dutch Shell Oil Corp., and the American subsidiary of British Petroleum met with Energy Task Force participants while they were developing national energy policy. ”Wiki 

One thing MOST don’t know, is that Ted Olsen defended the Vice President’s office in keeping these meetings secret before the Supreme Court. Olsen ALSO represented this administration in their bid to stop the recount in Florida, thus putting this administration in the White House. AND, his wife was on one of the planes during 9/11, and is the only one on record (according to Ted Olsen, since it was really HIS testimony ABOUT the phone calls (that the FBI in the case against the “20th hijacker” said didn’t happen) from Barbara that established the whole “box-cutters” theme.

Curious isn’t it? How ONE man is so intertwined in the whole story line.

The Prestige – Part 3: The Prestige (archive)

(archived from January 6, 2010)

by Scott Creighton

“Here is my secret. It is very simple: It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye.” Antoine de Saint Exupéry 1943

In 1996, a self-proclaimed terrorist and thief fled the reach of Osama bin Laden and ran right into the outstretched arms of the FBI, where he probably couldn’t have felt more at home.  He had stolen money from bin Laden, some one hundred thousand dollars it is said, and so the FBI offered him shelter, money, and new life.  For three years the American tax-payers shelled out nearly one million U.S. dollars to protect the thief in hiding. It was then, under the tutelage of FBI agent Jack Cloonan, that the very mythology of Al Qaeda was born. It was then that the craft of the first part of the Grand Illusion took shape.

How Do Barney Fife and Fidel Castro Factor Into the Biggest News Story of the Year? (archive)

(archived from February 6, 2015)

by Scott Creighton

I wish to see if I can connect a few dots here, so bear with me.

Putting aside “ISIS™” for a moment and the “Big Story” about some talking head on MSNBC lying to folks (yeah, there’s some news for you) what are the biggest geopolitical trends in the news today? Is it the fact that Syriza, the new “Radical Left™” brand of 3rd Way centrist ideology (think “CHANGE™” circa 2008) seems to have forgotten what the term “odious debt” means?

In international law, odious debt, also known as illegitimate debt, is a legal theory that holds that the national debt incurred by a regime for purposes that do not serve the best interests of the nation, should not be enforceable. Such debts are, thus, considered by this doctrine to be personal debts of the regime that incurred them and not debts of the state. In some respects, the concept is analogous to the invalidity of contracts signed under coercion. Wiki

Is that the biggest story in the world today? Well, if you consider the fact that international debt has risen by 57 trillion dollars since the global economic terrorism of 2008, coupled with the fact that much if not ALL of that new additional debt may be declared odious were Greece to set the precedent, well, that could very well be the story of the year. The story of the decade or the millennium in fact.

But it isn’t, because they wont. And the usually antagonistic ones, the Webster Tarpley’s of the “interwebs”, aren’t really calling for Syriza to live up to their campaign pledge and do that.

How about “ISIS™”? Now that the MTV music video director and their team made that “burning man” video, seems like all the world wants a piece of “ISIS™” butt.