For one week William Spruance got a taste of what it's like to be a SLAPPed little blogger. I had to suffer for four long years thru the efforts of Georgetown Law's campaign to silence dissidents in America. Where's my interview?
Showing posts with label Gilmore Lawsuit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gilmore Lawsuit. Show all posts
Monday, April 3, 2023
Monday, April 25, 2022
The Gilmore Lawsuit is Over
Four long years later, the Gilmore lawsuit is finally officially over for me. I consider the settlement a victory albeit a small one. At least I am done worrying about it.
Direct Support
Patreon https://www.patreon.com/americaneveryman
Cash App $scotty6199
Zelle rscdesigns@tampabay.rr.com (Chase bank)
FOLLOW/CONTACT:
YouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/scottcreighton1
Substack: https://scottcreighton.substack.com/
website: https://nomadiceveryman.blogspot.com/
BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/americaneveryman/
Email: rscdesigns@tampabay.rr.com
Thursday, March 31, 2022
Lawsuit and Ukraine UPDATES
Alex Jones and InfoWars settles while Ukraine presidential advisor praises ISIS tactics as the 'way of the future'
Monday, July 22, 2019
Tuesday, July 2, 2019
Sunday, June 23, 2019
Donation Request for Gilmore Lawsuit Legal Fund
The lawyer representing myself and the others in the lawsuit (AJ has his own) has done a great job and due to the fact that I am disabled and living hand to mouth, I need to ask you guys for some help paying him. Anything will help. Thank you all very much.
Email: rscdesigns@tampabay.rr.com
Saturday, March 30, 2019
The Gilmore Lawsuit Moves Forward
by Scott Creighton
The following is taken from Judge Norman Moon's decision regarding our motion to dismiss in the Gilmore lawsuit. The decision was rendered yesterday and at this point I am not sure how I will proceed from here.
Defendants in this matter are as follows:
The sections below the fold that I have carefully copied from the judge's decision relate to two sections that deal with 1. how Brennan Gilmore qualifies as a 'limited purpose public figure' 2. how the judge found our works to be of 'actionable' content published with 'actual malice' 3. the judge's specific findings in my own case and lastly, 4. the judge's refusal to consider motion for immunity and attorney's fees.
Allan West has been dropped from the lawsuit. All others remain.
I will be focusing a bit more on this action as I was waiting to hear what the judge was going to rule in the matter before providing additional cover on the story.
Depending on how I choose to move forward on this case, I will have to set up a GoFundMe in the near future for legal fees. Right now I am going to consult with my attorney, see what I owe so far and make a decision based on that. The judge didn't seem to care that I simply posted my opinion on a little blog and that I am disabled living in Florida where I don't have a reasonable chance to defend myself adequately as per the 14th amendment of the constitution.
Ironic isn't it that the whole point of the 'controversy' stimulated by the conflicts at the Unite the Right rallies in Charlottesville was one that centered on the unconstitutional argument that 'certain speech should not be allowed' and here we are with this guy suing us basically claiming the same thing with regard to reporting.
It's also interesting that Gilmore has said repeatedly that he hopes this lawsuit will make others 'think twice' before voicing their opinions online in the future.
The following is taken from Judge Norman Moon's decision regarding our motion to dismiss in the Gilmore lawsuit. The decision was rendered yesterday and at this point I am not sure how I will proceed from here.
Defendants in this matter are as follows:
- Scott Creighton (“Creighton”)
- James Hoft (“Hoft”)
- Lee Stranahan (“Stranahan”)
- Lee Ann Fleissner, a.k.a.Lee Ann McAdoo (“McAdoo”)
- Alex Jones (“Jones”),InfoWars, LLC (“InfoWars”), and Free SpeechSystems, LLC (“Free Speech Systems”)
- Derrick Wilburn (“Wilburn”), Michele Hickford (“Hickford”), and Words-N-Ideas, LLC (“Words-N-Ideas”)
The sections below the fold that I have carefully copied from the judge's decision relate to two sections that deal with 1. how Brennan Gilmore qualifies as a 'limited purpose public figure' 2. how the judge found our works to be of 'actionable' content published with 'actual malice' 3. the judge's specific findings in my own case and lastly, 4. the judge's refusal to consider motion for immunity and attorney's fees.
Allan West has been dropped from the lawsuit. All others remain.
I will be focusing a bit more on this action as I was waiting to hear what the judge was going to rule in the matter before providing additional cover on the story.
Depending on how I choose to move forward on this case, I will have to set up a GoFundMe in the near future for legal fees. Right now I am going to consult with my attorney, see what I owe so far and make a decision based on that. The judge didn't seem to care that I simply posted my opinion on a little blog and that I am disabled living in Florida where I don't have a reasonable chance to defend myself adequately as per the 14th amendment of the constitution.
Ironic isn't it that the whole point of the 'controversy' stimulated by the conflicts at the Unite the Right rallies in Charlottesville was one that centered on the unconstitutional argument that 'certain speech should not be allowed' and here we are with this guy suing us basically claiming the same thing with regard to reporting.
It's also interesting that Gilmore has said repeatedly that he hopes this lawsuit will make others 'think twice' before voicing their opinions online in the future.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)