by Scott Creighton
Hope?
Hmmm. Where have I seen that before?
Oh yeah. There it is.
Dr. Campbell was going off on the Hope Accord yesterday. He's all excited about it. Read off the short list of names on their front page. Currently they have about 23,000 people who have signed it. 20,000 of them are just regular Joes while the rest are doctors, scientists and other medical professionals. Only 700 doctors. Doesn't specify what kind of doctors.
Is John Campbell signed on as a 'doctor'?
There are 5 parts to the accord:
- THE IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF THE COVID-19 mRNA VACCINE PRODUCTS
- A COMPREHENSIVE RE-EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ALL COVID-19 VACCINE PRODUCTS
- THE IMMEDIATE RECOGNITION AND SUPPORT FOR THE VACCINE-INJURED
- THE RESTORATION OF ETHICAL PRINCIPLES ABANDONED DURING THE COVID-19 ERA
- ADDRESSING THE ROOT CAUSES OF OUR CURRENT PREDICAMENT
On their own the accords are... fine I guess. I mean, how can anyone argue against statements like this:
'Emergencies are never a
reason to abandon our principles; it is precisely at such times that we
most profoundly depend on them. Only after acknowledging they were
wrongly abandoned can we commit to upholding them consistently and in
doing so, better protect future generations' Accord 4
Our entire corrupted system is based on the principle of 'never let a good crisis go to waste as it is a chance to get things done the people would not normally tolerate' so coming out saying we should not abandon our principles due to perceived emergencies is kind of a polyanna approach to countering their main tool to transform our society.
In short, it's been said many times in the past and was said during the Covid-19 psyop by a lot of us to no avail.
And here we are again saying the same thing. Sure it sounds good. Like 'stop killing children in Gaza' sounds good but it is a sound strategy of resistance, just repeating the same shit we've been saying for DECADES?
'This new technology was granted emergency use
authorisation to address a situation that no longer exists. Going
forward, the burden of proof falls on those still advocating for these
products to compellingly demonstrate that they aren’t resulting in net
harm. Until such evidence is presented, regulators should suspend their
use as a matter of standard medical precaution.' Accord 1
Now this accord is summed up neatly but the only problem is... it ONLY deals with Covid-19 mRNA vaccine products... not other mRNA products that are currently being rolled out and developed.
Bold move now that NO ONE IS TAKING THE COVID VACCINES ANYMORE. So how brave is it really to come out saying we should stop giving em out? Instead what they SHOULD have stated in their accord is that NO MRNA treatment has EVER been proven effective at ANYTHING and based on their own research, the industry has shown they are more harmful than helpful at this stage.